143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37657600)
1. Hysteroscopic morcellation vs. curettage for removal of retained products of conception: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Wagenaar LP; Hamerlynck TW; Radder CM; Peters LW; Weyers S; Schoot BC; van Vliet HA
Fertil Steril; 2023 Dec; 120(6):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 37657600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Operative hysteroscopy versus ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration for removal of retained products of conception: A prospective cohort study.
Wagenaar LP; van Vliet HA; Radder CM; Peters LW; Weyers S; Schoot BC; Hamerlynck TW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2023 Dec; 20():100230. PubMed ID: 37701632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after treatment of retained products of conception: hysteroscopic removal vs ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration, a prospective follow-up study.
Wagenaar LP; van Vugt WLJ; Huppelschoten AG; Radder CM; Peters LW; Weyers S; van Wessel S; Schoot BC; Hamerlynck TWO; van Vliet HA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38521232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Office intrauterine morcellation for retained products of conception.
Damiani GR; Di Gennaro D; Vimercati A; Cicinelli E; Perrone AM; De Iaco P; Malvasi A; Gaetani M; Cascardi E; Cazzato G; Dellino M; Pellegrino A; Vitagliano A
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2023 Dec; 32(6):323-328. PubMed ID: 37493491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy with Manual Vacuum Aspiration Compared to Mechanical Morcellation.
Baikpour M; Hurd WW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1050-1055. PubMed ID: 30308305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hysteroscopy-assisted suction curettage for early pregnancy loss: does it reduce retained products of conception and postoperative intrauterine adhesions?
Moore O; Tzur T; Vaknin Z; Rabbi ML; Smorgick N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jan; 309(1):205-210. PubMed ID: 37782418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception Implanted Over a Focal Area of Adenomyosis: A Case Report.
Alonso L; Nieto L; Carugno J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):382-383. PubMed ID: 28939480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception.
van Wessel S; Coryn N; van Vliet H; Schoot B; Weyers S; Hamerlynck T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):840-846. PubMed ID: 31352066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel method for office aspiration curettage in cases of retained products of conception: A randomized controlled trial.
Pomeranz M; Goren Gepstein N; Ovadia M; Klein Z; Daykan Y; Schonman R; Arbib N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Nov; 100(11):2076-2081. PubMed ID: 34467531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic treatment for retained products of conception: what are the risk factors?
Barel O; Krakov A; Pansky M; Vaknin Z; Halperin R; Smorgick N
Fertil Steril; 2015 Mar; 103(3):775-9. PubMed ID: 25527235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Loop Resection for Removal of Placental Remnants: A Randomized Trial.
Hamerlynck TW; van Vliet HA; Beerens AS; Weyers S; Schoot BC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1172-1180. PubMed ID: 27590568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrauterine adhesion in ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) versus electric vacuum aspiration (EVA): a randomised controlled trial.
Chung JPW; Law TSM; Ng K; Ip PNP; Li TC
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Feb; 24(1):135. PubMed ID: 38355420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Additional considerations for hysteroscopic morcellation versus electric vacuum aspiration.
Ayyar A; Lindheim SR; Flyckt R
Fertil Steril; 2024 Jun; 121(6):1080. PubMed ID: 38346550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized Study Comparing a Reusable Morcellator with a Resectoscope in the Hysteroscopic Treatment of Uterine Polyps: The RESMO Study.
Stoll F; Lecointre L; Meyer N; Faller E; Host A; Hummel M; Boisrame T; Akladios C; Garbin O
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):801-810. PubMed ID: 32681995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-step hysteroscopy for management of morbidly adherent retained products of conception.
Smorgick N; Rabinovitch I; Levinsohn-Tavor O; Maymon R; Vaknin Z; Pansky M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):669-674. PubMed ID: 31321494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Operative Hysteroscopy vs Vacuum Aspiration for Incomplete Spontaneous Abortion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Huchon C; Drioueche H; Koskas M; Agostini A; Bauville E; Bourdel N; Fernandez H; Fritel X; Graesslin O; Legendre G; Lucot JP; Panel P; Raiffort C; Giraudet G; Bussières L; Fauconnier A
JAMA; 2023 Apr; 329(14):1197-1205. PubMed ID: 37039805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A "See and Treat" Office Procedure for Retained Products of Conception Removal After Normal Vaginal Delivery Using Manual Vacuum Aspiration: Preliminary Efficacy and Reproductive Outcomes.
Karavani G; Bahar R; Herzberg S; Yanai N
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 28642091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Operative hysteroscopy in the minimally invasive management of interstitial pregnancy and interstitially retained products of conception: A case report and systematic literature review.
D'hoore E; D'hoore L; Van den Berghe S; Roets E; van Wessel S; Hamerlynck T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Oct; 265():54-59. PubMed ID: 34428687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term complications and reproductive outcome after the management of retained products of conception: a systematic review.
Hooker AB; Aydin H; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jan; 105(1):156-64.e1-2. PubMed ID: 26453977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. See-and-treat in-office hysteroscopy versus operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of retained products of conception: A retrospective study.
Raz N; Sigal E; Gonzalez Arjona F; Calidona C; Garzon S; Uccella S; Laganà AS; Haimovich S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Sep; 48(9):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 35698805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
