These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37658057)

  • 21. Qmatey: an automated pipeline for fast exact matching-based alignment and strain-level taxonomic binning and profiling of metagenomes.
    Adams AK; Kristy BD; Gorman M; Balint-Kurti P; Yencho GC; Olukolu BA
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 37824740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selection of Appropriate Metagenome Taxonomic Classifiers for Ancient Microbiome Research.
    Velsko IM; Frantz LAF; Herbig A; Larson G; Warinner C
    mSystems; 2018; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 30035235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection of
    Lindstedt K; Buczek D; Pedersen T; Hjerde E; Raffelsberger N; Suzuki Y; Brisse S; Holt K; Samuelsen Ø; Sundsfjord A
    Gut Microbes; 2022; 14(1):2118500. PubMed ID: 36045603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Melon: metagenomic long-read-based taxonomic identification and quantification using marker genes.
    Chen X; Yin X; Shi X; Yan W; Yang Y; Liu L; Zhang T
    Genome Biol; 2024 Aug; 25(1):226. PubMed ID: 39160564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Benchmarking taxonomic classifiers with Illumina and Nanopore sequence data for clinical metagenomic diagnostic applications.
    Govender KN; Eyre DW
    Microb Genom; 2022 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 36269282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Characterization and simulation of metagenomic nanopore sequencing data with Meta-NanoSim.
    Yang C; Lo T; Nip KM; Hafezqorani S; Warren RL; Birol I
    Gigascience; 2023 Mar; 12():. PubMed ID: 36939007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
    Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
    Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Alignment-free supervised classification of metagenomes by recursive SVM.
    Cui H; Zhang X
    BMC Genomics; 2013 Sep; 14():641. PubMed ID: 24053649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis.
    Dubinkina VB; Ischenko DS; Ulyantsev VI; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17():38. PubMed ID: 26774270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Taxometer: Improving taxonomic classification of metagenomics contigs.
    Kutuzova S; Nielsen M; Piera P; Nissen JN; Rasmussen S
    Nat Commun; 2024 Sep; 15(1):8357. PubMed ID: 39333501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. MAGICIAN: MAG simulation for investigating criteria for bioinformatic analysis.
    Steinke K; Pamp SJ; Munk P
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):55. PubMed ID: 38216924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. TaxiBGC: a Taxonomy-Guided Approach for Profiling Experimentally Characterized Microbial Biosynthetic Gene Clusters and Secondary Metabolite Production Potential in Metagenomes.
    Gupta VK; Bakshi U; Chang D; Lee AR; Davis JM; Chandrasekaran S; Jin YS; Freeman MF; Sung J
    mSystems; 2022 Dec; 7(6):e0092522. PubMed ID: 36378489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mock community taxonomic classification performance of publicly available shotgun metagenomics pipelines.
    Valencia EM; Maki KA; Dootz JN; Barb JJ
    Sci Data; 2024 Jan; 11(1):81. PubMed ID: 38233447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Metagenomic functional profiling: to sketch or not to sketch?
    Hera MR; Liu S; Wei W; Rodriguez JS; Ma C; Koslicki D
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Sep; 40(Suppl 2):ii165-ii173. PubMed ID: 39230701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Massive metagenomic data analysis using abundance-based machine learning.
    Harris ZN; Dhungel E; Mosior M; Ahn TH
    Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):12. PubMed ID: 31370905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Benchmarking microbiome transformations favors experimental quantitative approaches to address compositionality and sampling depth biases.
    Lloréns-Rico V; Vieira-Silva S; Gonçalves PJ; Falony G; Raes J
    Nat Commun; 2021 Jun; 12(1):3562. PubMed ID: 34117246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benchmarking informatics approaches for virus discovery: caution is needed when combining
    Hegarty B; Riddell V J; Bastien E; Langenfeld K; Lindback M; Saini JS; Wing A; Zhang J; Duhaime M
    mSystems; 2024 Mar; 9(3):e0110523. PubMed ID: 38376167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An in-depth evaluation of metagenomic classifiers for soil microbiomes.
    Edwin NR; Fitzpatrick AH; Brennan F; Abram F; O'Sullivan O
    Environ Microbiome; 2024 Mar; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 38549112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving Bacterial Metagenomic Research through Long-Read Sequencing.
    Greenman N; Hassouneh SA; Abdelli LS; Johnston C; Azarian T
    Microorganisms; 2024 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 38792764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Infer Metagenomic Abundance and Reveal Homologous Genomes Based on the Structure of Taxonomy Tree.
    Qiu YQ; Tian X; Zhang S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(5):1112-22. PubMed ID: 26451823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.