184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37658209)
1. Outcomes for Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of 21-30-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Feasible Study.
Okimoto K; Matsumura T; Matsusaka K; Inaba Y; Ishikawa T; Akizue N; Kaneko T; Ota M; Ohta Y; Taida T; Saito K; Ogasawara S; Maruoka D; Kato J; Ikeda JI; Kato N
Dig Dis Sci; 2023 Oct; 68(10):3963-3973. PubMed ID: 37658209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20-30 mm colorectal polyps.
Inoue T; Nakagawa K; Yamasaki Y; Shichijo S; Kanesaka T; Maekawa A; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Takeuchi Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2549-2557. PubMed ID: 33724540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Goelder SK; Roemmele C; Neuhaus L; Weber T; Braun G; Probst A; Schnoy E; Kafel AJ; Muzalyova A; Messmann H
Gastroenterology; 2021 Nov; 161(5):1460-1474.e1. PubMed ID: 34371000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps.
Yamashina T; Uedo N; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T
Gastroenterology; 2019 Aug; 157(2):451-461.e2. PubMed ID: 30981791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).
Zhang Z; Xia Y; Cui H; Yuan X; Wang C; Xie J; Tong Y; Wang W; Xu L
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 32967616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility and outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥ 10 mm colorectal polyps.
Siau K; Ishaq S; Cadoni S; Kuwai T; Yusuf A; Suzuki N
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2656-2663. PubMed ID: 29101560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colon polyps superior to conventional techniques? A network analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection.
Tan DJH; Ng CH; Lim XC; Lim WH; Yuen LZH; Koh JH; Nistala KRY; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah MD
Endosc Int Open; 2022 Jan; 10(1):E154-E162. PubMed ID: 35047346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Propensity score-matched analysis of endoscopic resection for recurrent colorectal neoplasms: A pilot study.
Ohmori M; Yamasaki Y; Iwagami H; Nakahira H; Matsuura N; Shichijo S; Maekawa A; Kanesaka T; Yamamoto S; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Okada H; Takeuchi Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2568-2574. PubMed ID: 33843099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li DF; Lai MG; Yang MF; Zou ZY; Xu J; Peng RM; Xiong F; Wei C; Zhang DG; Xu ZL; Wang LS; Yao J
Endoscopy; 2021 Jun; 53(6):636-646. PubMed ID: 32767283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (with videos).
Park SS; Han KS; Kim B; Chang Kim B; Hong CW; Sohn DK; Chang HJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 May; 91(5):1164-1171.e2. PubMed ID: 31904380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors.
Chow CWS; Fung TLD; Chan PT; Kwok KH
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1293-1302. PubMed ID: 36192659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Ng CH; Lin SY; Tan DJH; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah M
World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(25):3925-3939. PubMed ID: 34321855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Underwater
Ni DQ; Lu YP; Liu XQ; Gao LY; Huang X
World J Clin Cases; 2020 Oct; 8(20):4826-4837. PubMed ID: 33195650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EVALUATION OF UNDERWATER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION FOR COLORECTAL POLYPS IN AN OUTPATIENT CLINIC IN BRAZIL.
Schacher FC; Braga QM; Severo HR; Barlem GG; John JA; Sander GB
Arq Gastroenterol; 2021; 58(3):390-393. PubMed ID: 34705976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Backes Y; Moons LM; van Bergeijk JD; Berk L; Ter Borg F; Ter Borg PC; Elias SG; Geesing JM; Groen JN; Hadithi M; Hardwick JC; Kerkhof M; Mangen MJ; Straathof JW; Schröder R; Schwartz MP; Spanier BW; de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Wolfhagen FH; Koch AD
BMC Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 16(1):56. PubMed ID: 27229709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (with videos): a single center retrospective study.
Shi H; Wang C; Wu J; Qin B; Jiang J; Liu N; Song Y; Qin Y; Ma S
BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):276. PubMed ID: 35655173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility and Efficacy of Gastric Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.
Kim DH; Park SY; Kim JW; Kim HS
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Mar; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 38473010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility study comparing underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor < 20 mm.
Kiguchi Y; Kato M; Nakayama A; Sasaki M; Mizutani M; Tsutsumi K; Akimoto T; Takatori Y; Mutaguchi M; Takabayashi K; Ochiai Y; Maehata T; Kanai T; Yahagi N
Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):753-760. PubMed ID: 31498932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
