BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37660301)

  • 1. An intersectional framework for counterfactual fairness in risk prediction.
    Wastvedt S; Huling JD; Wolfson J
    Biostatistics; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37660301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictably unequal: understanding and addressing concerns that algorithmic clinical prediction may increase health disparities.
    Paulus JK; Kent DM
    NPJ Digit Med; 2020; 3():99. PubMed ID: 32821854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Causal fairness assessment of treatment allocation with electronic health records.
    Zhang L; Richter LR; Wang Y; Ostropolets A; Elhadad N; Blei DM; Hripcsak G
    J Biomed Inform; 2024 Jul; 155():104656. PubMed ID: 38782170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An empirical characterization of fair machine learning for clinical risk prediction.
    Pfohl SR; Foryciarz A; Shah NH
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Jan; 113():103621. PubMed ID: 33220494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A step toward building a unified framework for managing AI bias.
    Rana SA; Azizul ZH; Awan AA
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1630. PubMed ID: 38077542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Counterfactual fairness: The case study of a food delivery platform's reputational-ranking algorithm.
    Piccininni M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1015100. PubMed ID: 36389466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A joint fairness model with applications to risk predictions for underrepresented populations.
    Do H; Nandi S; Putzel P; Smyth P; Zhong J
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):826-840. PubMed ID: 35142367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Joint Fairness Model with Applications to Risk Predictions for Under-represented Populations.
    Do H; Nandi S; Putzel P; Smyth P; Zhong J
    ArXiv; 2021 May; ():. PubMed ID: 34012993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From fair predictions to just decisions? Conceptualizing algorithmic fairness and distributive justice in the context of data-driven decision-making.
    Kuppler M; Kern C; Bach RL; Kreuter F
    Front Sociol; 2022; 7():883999. PubMed ID: 36299413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Algorithmic fairness in pandemic forecasting: lessons from COVID-19.
    Tsai TC; Arik S; Jacobson BH; Yoon J; Yoder N; Sava D; Mitchell M; Graham G; Pfister T
    NPJ Digit Med; 2022 May; 5(1):59. PubMed ID: 35538215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FairRankVis: A Visual Analytics Framework for Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Graph Mining Models.
    Xie T; Ma Y; Kang J; Tong H; Maciejewski R
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Jan; 28(1):368-377. PubMed ID: 34587074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential Fairness: An Intersectional Framework for Fair AI.
    Islam R; Keya KN; Pan S; Sarwate AD; Foulds JR
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Apr; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 37190449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of fairness in algorithmic decisions: Future developers' perspective.
    Kleanthous S; Kasinidou M; Barlas P; Otterbacher J
    Patterns (N Y); 2022 Jan; 3(1):100380. PubMed ID: 35079711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation and Mitigation of Racial Bias in Clinical Machine Learning Models: Scoping Review.
    Huang J; Galal G; Etemadi M; Vaidyanathan M
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 May; 10(5):e36388. PubMed ID: 35639450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Intersectionality Toolbox: A Resource for Teaching and Applying an Intersectional Lens in Public Health.
    Sabik NJ
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():772301. PubMed ID: 34926389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretability and fairness evaluation of deep learning models on MIMIC-IV dataset.
    Meng C; Trinh L; Xu N; Enouen J; Liu Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7166. PubMed ID: 35504931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fairness and Risk: An Ethical Argument for a Group Fairness Definition Insurers Can Use.
    Baumann J; Loi M
    Philos Technol; 2023; 36(3):45. PubMed ID: 37346393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework.
    Murphy P; Glynn D; Dias S; Hodgson R; Claxton L; Beresford L; Cooper K; Tappenden P; Ennis K; Grosso A; Wright K; Cantrell A; Stevenson M; Palmer S
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Dec; 25(76):1-228. PubMed ID: 34990339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IF-City: Intelligible Fair City Planning to Measure, Explain and Mitigate Inequality.
    Lyu Y; Lu H; Lee MK; Schmitt G; Lim BY
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Jul; 30(7):3749-3766. PubMed ID: 37022033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.