210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37660400)
1. Differences and similarities in false interpretations by AI CAD and radiologists in screening mammography.
Salim M; Dembrower K; Eklund M; Smith K; Strand F
Br J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 96(1151):20230210. PubMed ID: 37660400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.
Kim H; Choi JS; Kim K; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7186-7198. PubMed ID: 37188881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.
Kwon MR; Chang Y; Ham SY; Cho Y; Kim EY; Kang J; Park EK; Kim KH; Kim M; Kim TS; Lee H; Kwon R; Lim GY; Choi HR; Choi J; Kook SH; Ryu S
Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Apr; 26(1):68. PubMed ID: 38649889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.
Lång K; Josefsson V; Larsson AM; Larsson S; Högberg C; Sartor H; Hofvind S; Andersson I; Rosso A
Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):936-944. PubMed ID: 37541274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial intelligence (AI) for breast cancer screening: BreastScreen population-based cohort study of cancer detection.
Marinovich ML; Wylie E; Lotter W; Lund H; Waddell A; Madeley C; Pereira G; Houssami N
EBioMedicine; 2023 Apr; 90():104498. PubMed ID: 36863255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms.
Schaffter T; Buist DSM; Lee CI; Nikulin Y; Ribli D; Guan Y; Lotter W; Jie Z; Du H; Wang S; Feng J; Feng M; Kim HE; Albiol F; Albiol A; Morrell S; Wojna Z; Ahsen ME; Asif U; Jimeno Yepes A; Yohanandan S; Rabinovici-Cohen S; Yi D; Hoff B; Yu T; Chaibub Neto E; Rubin DL; Lindholm P; Margolies LR; McBride RB; Rothstein JH; Sieh W; Ben-Ari R; Harrer S; Trister A; Friend S; Norman T; Sahiner B; Strand F; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; ; Mackey L; Cahoon J; Shen L; Sohn JH; Trivedi H; Shen Y; Buturovic L; Pereira JC; Cardoso JS; Castro E; Kalleberg KT; Pelka O; Nedjar I; Geras KJ; Nensa F; Goan E; Koitka S; Caballero L; Cox DD; Krishnaswamy P; Pandey G; Friedrich CM; Perrin D; Fookes C; Shi B; Cardoso Negrie G; Kawczynski M; Cho K; Khoo CS; Lo JY; Sorensen AG; Jung H
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e200265. PubMed ID: 32119094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Teuwen J; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4825-4832. PubMed ID: 30993432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in screening mammography in Sweden: a prospective, population-based, paired-reader, non-inferiority study.
Dembrower K; Crippa A; Colón E; Eklund M; Strand F;
Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Oct; 5(10):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 37690911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.
Salim M; Wåhlin E; Dembrower K; Azavedo E; Foukakis T; Liu Y; Smith K; Eklund M; Strand F
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 32852536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining the strengths of radiologists and AI for breast cancer screening: a retrospective analysis.
Leibig C; Brehmer M; Bunk S; Byng D; Pinker K; Umutlu L
Lancet Digit Health; 2022 Jul; 4(7):e507-e519. PubMed ID: 35750400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.
Kim HE; Kim HH; Han BK; Kim KH; Han K; Nam H; Lee EH; Kim EK
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Mar; 2(3):e138-e148. PubMed ID: 33334578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer detection accuracy of AI in an entire screening population: a retrospective, multicentre study.
Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Graumann O; Nielsen M; Lång K; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Rasmussen BSB
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Dec; 23(1):127. PubMed ID: 38124111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists.
Kim JG; Haslam B; Diab AR; Sakhare A; Grisot G; Lee H; Holt J; Lee CI; Lotter W; Sorensen AG
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230137. PubMed ID: 38323914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence.
Dahlblom V; Dustler M; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3754-3765. PubMed ID: 36502459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy.
Freeman K; Geppert J; Stinton C; Todkill D; Johnson S; Clarke A; Taylor-Phillips S
BMJ; 2021 Sep; 374():n1872. PubMed ID: 34470740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: a retrospective simulation study.
Dembrower K; Wåhlin E; Liu Y; Salim M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Eklund M; Strand F
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Sep; 2(9):e468-e474. PubMed ID: 33328114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiologists' interpretive efficiency and variability in true- and false-positive detection when screen-reading with tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) relative to standard mammography in population screening.
Svahn TM; Macaskill P; Houssami N
Breast; 2015 Dec; 24(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 26433751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis.
Kizildag Yirgin I; Koyluoglu YO; Seker ME; Ozkan Gurdal S; Ozaydin AN; Ozcinar B; Cabioğlu N; Ozmen V; Aribal E
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221075172. PubMed ID: 35060413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
