These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37660506)

  • 21. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with dinoprostone compared with cervical balloon: A retrospective, international study.
    Di Mascio D; Villalain C; Rizzo G; Morales‐Rosello J; Sileo FG; Maruotti GM; Prefumo F; Galindo A; D'Antonio F;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jul; 100(7):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 33792924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
    Alfirevic Z; Aflaifel N; Weeks A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 2014(6):CD001338. PubMed ID: 24924489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review.
    Rydahl E; Eriksen L; Juhl M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Feb; 17(2):170-208. PubMed ID: 30299344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
    Kerr RS; Kumar N; Williams MJ; Cuthbert A; Aflaifel N; Haas DM; Weeks AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 6(6):CD014484. PubMed ID: 34155622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.
    Steetskamp J; Bachmann E; Hasenburg A; Battista MJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 32761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital.
    Blanchette HA; Nayak S; Erasmus S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1551-9. PubMed ID: 10368503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Jones MM; Rahall A; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1804-10. PubMed ID: 7778636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a meta-analysis.
    Wang L; Zheng J; Wang W; Fu J; Hou L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(8):1297-307. PubMed ID: 26067262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
    Jozwiak M; Bloemenkamp KW; Kelly AJ; Mol BW; Irion O; Boulvain M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD001233. PubMed ID: 22419277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Garg R; Bagga R; Kumari A; Kalra J; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Feb; 42(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 34027782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
    Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
    Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the effect of oral and vaginal misoprostol on labor induction: updating a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies.
    Rahimi M; Haghighi L; Baradaran HR; Azami M; Larijani SS; Kazemzadeh P; Moradi Y
    Eur J Med Res; 2023 Jan; 28(1):51. PubMed ID: 36707858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
    Jozwiak M; Dodd JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD009792. PubMed ID: 23543582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of fetal safety of vaginal Misoprostol tablet and Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor: An open-label randomized control trial.
    Samanta A; Rakshit BM; Mistri PK; Chakraborty A; Bag T; Das P; Pande A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2267-2272. PubMed ID: 37421158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Labor outcomes of obese patients undergoing induction of labor with misoprostol compared to dinoprostone.
    Suidan RS; Rondon KC; Apuzzio JJ; Williams SF
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 Feb; 30(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 24915563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.