159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37660858)
21. Cadmium-resistant
Thooppeng P; Junpradit C; Rongsayamanont W; Duangmal K; Prapagdee B
Int J Phytoremediation; 2023; 25(10):1318-1327. PubMed ID: 36448248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Isolation of cellulose nanocrystals from different waste bio-mass collating their liquid crystal ordering with morphological exploration.
Verma C; Chhajed M; Gupta P; Roy S; Maji PK
Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Apr; 175():242-253. PubMed ID: 33561456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of hydrolysis time, pH and surfactant type on stability of hydrochloric acid hydrolyzed nanocellulose.
Pawcenis D; Leśniak M; Szumera M; Sitarz M; Profic-Paczkowska J
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Dec; 222(Pt B):1996-2005. PubMed ID: 36208805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Morphological, chemical and thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from bamboo fibre.
Rasheed M; Jawaid M; Parveez B; Zuriyati A; Khan A
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Oct; 160():183-191. PubMed ID: 32454108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Enhanced materials from nature: nanocellulose from citrus waste.
Mariño M; Lopes da Silva L; Durán N; Tasic L
Molecules; 2015 Apr; 20(4):5908-23. PubMed ID: 25854755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preparation of nanocellulose from micro-crystalline cellulose: The effect on the performance and properties of agar-based composite films.
Shankar S; Rhim JW
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Jan; 135():18-26. PubMed ID: 26453846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Isolation and characterization of nanocellulose from selected hardwoods, viz., Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. and Casuarina equisetifolia L., by steam explosion method.
Raju V; Revathiswaran R; Subramanian KS; Parthiban KT; Chandrakumar K; Anoop EV; Chirayil CJ
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1199. PubMed ID: 36681725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Extraction and Characterization of Nanocellulose Structures from Linter Dissolving Pulp Using Ultrafine Grinder.
Ghasemi S; Behrooz R; Ghasemi I
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2016 Jun; 16(6):5791-7. PubMed ID: 27427633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cytocompatible cellulose nanofibers from invasive plant species Agave americana L. and Ricinus communis L.: a renewable green source of highly crystalline nanocellulose.
L Evdokimova O; S Alves C; M Krsmanović Whiffen R; Ortega Z; Tomás H; Rodrigues J
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2021 Jun; 22(6):450-461. PubMed ID: 34128369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Structure and thermal properties of cellulose nanofibrils extracted from alkali-ultrasound treated windmill palm fibers.
Chen C; Huang D; Yang Q; Wang G; Wang X
Int J Biol Macromol; 2023 Dec; 253(Pt 2):126645. PubMed ID: 37659487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Valorization of Eichhornia crassipes for the production of cellulose nanocrystals further investigation of plethoric biobased resource.
Hemida MH; Moustafa H; Mehanny S; Morsy M; Abd El Rahman EN; Ibrahim MM
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12387. PubMed ID: 38811644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Structure and Properties of Polylactic Acid Biocomposite Films Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibrils.
Wang Q; Ji C; Sun J; Zhu Q; Liu J
Molecules; 2020 Jul; 25(14):. PubMed ID: 32708238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Isolation of cellulose-II nanospheres from flax stems and their physical and morphological properties.
Astruc J; Nagalakshmaiah M; Laroche G; Grandbois M; Elkoun S; Robert M
Carbohydr Polym; 2017 Dec; 178():352-359. PubMed ID: 29050605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Controlling the nanocellulose morphology by preparation conditions.
Qi Y; Wang S; Liza AA; Li J; Yang G; Zhu W; Song J; Xiao H; Li H; Guo J
Carbohydr Polym; 2023 Nov; 319():121146. PubMed ID: 37567702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cellulose nanofibers from lignocellulosic biomass of lemongrass using enzymatic hydrolysis: characterization and cytotoxicity assessment.
Kumari P; Pathak G; Gupta R; Sharma D; Meena A
Daru; 2019 Dec; 27(2):683-693. PubMed ID: 31654377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of hydrolysis conditions on the morphology of cellulose II nanocrystals (CNC-II) derived from mercerized microcrystalline cellulose.
Li J; Wang Z; Wang P; Tian J; Liu T; Guo J; Zhu W; Khan MR; Xiao H; Song J
Int J Biol Macromol; 2024 Feb; 258(Pt 2):128936. PubMed ID: 38143058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative study on properties of micro and nanopapers produced from cellulose and cellulose nanofibres.
Mtibe A; Linganiso LZ; Mathew AP; Oksman K; John MJ; Anandjiwala RD
Carbohydr Polym; 2015 Mar; 118():1-8. PubMed ID: 25542099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of different methods for extraction of nanocellulose from yerba mate residues.
Dahlem MA; Borsoi C; Hansen B; Catto AL
Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Aug; 218():78-86. PubMed ID: 31221346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose Nanocrystals from Date Palm Waste.
Raza M; Abu-Jdayil B; Banat F; Al-Marzouqi AH
ACS Omega; 2022 Jul; 7(29):25366-25379. PubMed ID: 35910104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Investigation of Dielectric and Mechanical Properties of Pretreated Natural Sunn Hemp Fiber-Reinforced Composite in Correlation with Macromolecular Structure of the Fiber.
Dash C; Das R; Sahu DK; Upreti D; Patro TU; Bisoyi DK
Biomacromolecules; 2023 Mar; 24(3):1329-1344. PubMed ID: 36848205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
