141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37660895)
1. The move-C cervical artificial disc can restore intact range of motion and 3-D kinematics.
Vogt M; Zengerle L; Jonas R; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):340-351. PubMed ID: 37660895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of cervical total disc replacement on motion in the target and adjacent segments.
Vogt M; Mehren C; Hackenbroch C; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1313-1322. PubMed ID: 38301903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examination of cervical spine kinematics in complex, multiplanar motions after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and total disc replacement.
Daniels AH; Paller DJ; Feller RJ; Thakur NA; Biercevicz AM; Palumbo MA; Crisco JJ; Madom IA
Int J Spine Surg; 2012; 6():190-4. PubMed ID: 25694890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two-level, straight versus lordotic fusion.
Martin S; Ghanayem AJ; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):1359-66. PubMed ID: 21629170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement.
Cakir B; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Schmidt R; Reichel H; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S592-8. PubMed ID: 19882178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total Disk Replacement Adjacent to a Multilevel Fusion in the Cervical Spine: A Biomechanical Motion Analysis.
Segal DN; Grabel ZJ; Wilson JM; Milby AH; Shi WJ; Hutton WC; Rhee JM
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e881-e889. PubMed ID: 30391767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center.
Barrey C; Mosnier T; Jund J; Perrin G; Skalli W
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Nov; 11(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19929355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation.
Barrey C; Campana S; Persohn S; Perrin G; Skalli W
Eur Spine J; 2012 Mar; 21(3):432-42. PubMed ID: 21833571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.
Patwardhan AG; Tzermiadianos MN; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Reo ML; Carandang G; Ritter-Lang K; Havey RM
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S618-29. PubMed ID: 20865285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty.
Havey RM; Khayatzadeh S; Voronov LI; Blank KR; Carandang G; Harding DP; Patwardhan AG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():34-41. PubMed ID: 30665037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influences of functional structures on the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine.
Jonas R; Demmelmaier R; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2020 Dec; 20(12):2014-2024. PubMed ID: 32768654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The segmental distribution of cervical range of motion: A comparison of ACDF versus TDR-C.
Chang SW; Bohl MA; Kelly BP; Wade C
J Clin Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 57():185-193. PubMed ID: 30197057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
