BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37660898)

  • 1. Clinical outcome of surgical management of mild cervical compressive myelopathy based on minimum clinically important difference.
    Hirai H; Fujishiro T; Nakaya Y; Hayama S; Usami Y; Mizutani M; Nakano A; Neo M
    Spine J; 2024 Jan; 24(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 37660898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.
    Maruo K; Moriyama T; Tachibana T; Inoue S; Arizumi F; Daimon T; Yoshiya S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):938-43. PubMed ID: 25279653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging.
    Yagi M; Ninomiya K; Kihara M; Horiuchi Y
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jan; 12(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 20043766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive factors affecting outcome after cervical laminoplasty.
    Yoon ST; Raich A; Hashimoto RE; Riew KD; Shaffrey CI; Rhee JM; Tetreault LA; Skelly AC; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S232-52. PubMed ID: 23962999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Kim B; Yoon DH; Shin HC; Kim KN; Yi S; Shin DA; Ha Y
    Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):875-84. PubMed ID: 25637468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Study of Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients With Large Anterior Compression of the Spinal Cord.
    Hirai T; Yoshii T; Arai Y; Sakai K; Torigoe I; Maehara H; Tomori M; Taniyama T; Sato H; Okawa A
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1137-E1142. PubMed ID: 28099187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.
    Qin R; Chen X; Zhou P; Li M; Hao J; Zhang F
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1375-1387. PubMed ID: 29335903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical outcomes of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in very elderly patients (older than 80 years): Time from symptom onset to surgery and changes in spinal cord signal intensity on MRI.
    Notani N; Miyazaki M; Kanezaki S; Ishihara T; Tsumura H
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 160():78-82. PubMed ID: 28692908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty?
    Fujimori T; Le H; Ziewacz JE; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Jul; 35(1):E9. PubMed ID: 23815254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.
    Seichi A; Takeshita K; Ohishi I; Kawaguchi H; Akune T; Anamizu Y; Kitagawa T; Nakamura K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 11242374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative Symptom Duration Influences Neurological Recovery and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Surgical Treatment of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
    Matsukura Y; Egawa S; Inose H; Sakai K; Kusano K; Tsutsui S; Hirai T; Wada K; Katsumi K; Koda M; Kimura A; Furuya T; Maki S; Nagoshi N; Nishida N; Nagamoto Y; Oshima Y; Ando K; Nakashima H; Takahata M; Mori K; Nakajima H; Murata K; Miyagi M; Kaito T; Yamada K; Banno T; Kato S; Ohba T; Moridaira H; Fujibayashi S; Katoh H; Kanno H; Taneichi H; Imagama S; Kawaguchi Y; Takeshita K; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Yamazaki M; Okawa A; Yoshii T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Sep; 48(18):1259-1265. PubMed ID: 37368973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of outcome following laminoplasty of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Focus on the minimum clinically important difference.
    Machino M; Ando K; Kobayashi K; Nakashima H; Kanbara S; Ito S; Inoue T; Koshimizu H; Ito K; Kato F; Imagama S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 81():321-327. PubMed ID: 33222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological evidence of functional improvement in the corticospinal tract after laminoplasty in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy: clinical article.
    Nakanishi K; Tanaka N; Kamei N; Ohta R; Fujioka Y; Hiramatsu T; Ujigo S; Ochi M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 24855997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reoperation for Late Neurological Deterioration After Laminoplasty in Individuals With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Comparison of Cases of Cervical Spondylosis and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ito K; Ouchida J; Morita D; Ando K; Kobayashi K; Ishiguro N; Imagama S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Aug; 45(15):E909-E916. PubMed ID: 32675602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion tensor imaging can predict surgical outcomes of patients with cervical compression myelopathy.
    Maki S; Koda M; Kitamura M; Inada T; Kamiya K; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Masuda Y; Matsumoto K; Kojima M; Obata T; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Furuya T
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2459-2466. PubMed ID: 28623403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.
    Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus French-door technique.
    Lee DG; Lee SH; Park SJ; Kim ES; Chung SS; Lee CS; Eoh W
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):E198-203. PubMed ID: 23511650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between preoperative cervical sagittal balance and clinical outcome of laminoplasty treated cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament patients.
    Xu C; Zhang Y; Dong M; Wu H; Yu W; Tian Y; Cao P; Chen H; Wang X; Shen X; Liu Y; Yuan W
    Spine J; 2020 Sep; 20(9):1422-1429. PubMed ID: 32474225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Modified Unilateral Open-door Laminoplasty with Posterior Muscle-Ligament Complex Preservation for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
    Chen C; Yang C; Yang S; Gao Y; Zhang Y; Wu X; Hua W; Shao Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 31794507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Koda M; Mochizuki M; Konishi H; Aiba A; Kadota R; Inada T; Kamiya K; Ota M; Maki S; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Mannoji C; Furuya T
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2294-301. PubMed ID: 27072553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.