These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37661220)

  • 1. Real-time rate of penetration prediction for motorized bottom hole assembly using machine learning methods.
    Shokry A; Elkatatny S; Abdulraheem A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14496. PubMed ID: 37661220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A New Model for Predicting Rate of Penetration Using an Artificial Neural Network.
    Elkatatny S; Al-AbdulJabbar A; Abdelgawad K
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(7):. PubMed ID: 32268597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real-time prediction of formation pressure gradient while drilling.
    Abdelaal A; Elkatatny S; Abdulraheem A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11318. PubMed ID: 35790798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Advanced Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Neural Network Method for Predicting Rate of Penetration (ROP).
    Ji H; Lou Y; Cheng S; Xie Z; Zhu L
    ACS Omega; 2023 Jan; 8(1):934-945. PubMed ID: 36643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-Time Prediction of Rate of Penetration in S-Shape Well Profile Using Artificial Intelligence Models.
    Elkatatny S
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32575868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine Learning Solution for Predicting Vibrations while Drilling the Curve Section.
    Saadeldin R; Gamal H; Elkatatny S
    ACS Omega; 2023 Oct; 8(39):35822-35836. PubMed ID: 37810734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting downhole vibrations through drilling horizontal sections: machine learning study.
    Saadeldin R; Gamal H; Elkatatny S
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6204. PubMed ID: 37069188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine Learning Models for Equivalent Circulating Density Prediction from Drilling Data.
    Gamal H; Abdelaal A; Elkatatny S
    ACS Omega; 2021 Oct; 6(41):27430-27442. PubMed ID: 34693164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applications of Different Classification Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Formation Tops and Lithology While Drilling.
    Ibrahim AF; Ahmed A; Elkatatny S
    ACS Omega; 2023 Nov; 8(45):42152-42163. PubMed ID: 38024670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of the Least Principal Stresses Using Drilling Data: A Machine Learning Application.
    Gowida A; Ibrahim AF; Elkatatny S; Ali A
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():8865827. PubMed ID: 34887917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Developed Robust Model and Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Drilling Fluid Density and Equivalent Circulation Density in Real Time.
    Al-Rubaii M; Al-Shargabi M; Aldahlawi B; Al-Shehri D; Minaev KM
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 37514886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data-Driven Modeling Approach for Pore Pressure Gradient Prediction while Drilling from Drilling Parameters.
    Abdelaal A; Elkatatny S; Abdulraheem A
    ACS Omega; 2021 Jun; 6(21):13807-13816. PubMed ID: 34095673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Machine Learning Model for Monitoring Rheological Properties of Synthetic Oil-Based Mud.
    Alsabaa A; Gamal H; Elkatatny S; Abdelraouf Y
    ACS Omega; 2022 May; 7(18):15603-15614. PubMed ID: 35571769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data-Driven Framework for Real-time Rheological Properties Prediction of Flat Rheology Synthetic Oil-Based Drilling Fluids.
    Abdelaal A; Ibrahim AF; Elkatatny S
    ACS Omega; 2023 Apr; 8(16):14371-14386. PubMed ID: 37125126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time prediction of ROP based on GRU-Informer.
    Tu B; Bai K; Zhan C; Zhang W
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):2133. PubMed ID: 38272964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of jumbo drill penetration rate in underground mines using various machine learning approaches and traditional models.
    Heydari S; Hoseinie SH; Bagherpour R
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8928. PubMed ID: 38637673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ROP Prediction Method Based on PCA-Informer Modeling.
    Wang Y; Lou Y; Lin Y; Cai Q; Zhu L
    ACS Omega; 2024 Jun; 9(22):23822-23831. PubMed ID: 38854564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-time prediction of Poisson's ratio from drilling parameters using machine learning tools.
    Siddig O; Gamal H; Elkatatny S; Abdulraheem A
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):12611. PubMed ID: 34131264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling rate of penetration in drilling operations using RBF, MLP, LSSVM, and DT models.
    Riazi M; Mehrjoo H; Nakhaei R; Jalalifar H; Shateri M; Riazi M; Ostadhassan M; Hemmati-Sarapardeh A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11650. PubMed ID: 35803953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-Time Prediction of Petrophysical Properties Using Machine Learning Based on Drilling Parameters.
    Hassaan S; Mohamed A; Ibrahim AF; Elkatatny S
    ACS Omega; 2024 Apr; 9(15):17066-17075. PubMed ID: 38645308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.