These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37662853)

  • 21. Update on the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Full-Arch Impressions of Partially Edentulous and Fully Dentate Jaws in Young and Elderly Subjects: A Clinical Trial.
    Schlenz MA; Stillersfeld JM; Wöstmann B; Schmidt A
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jun; 11(13):. PubMed ID: 35807008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Scan Pattern on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions with Two Intraoral Scanners.
    Li Z; Huang R; Wu X; Chen Z; Huang B; Chen Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):731-739. PubMed ID: 35904829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of supramucosal height of a scan body and implant angulation on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: An in vitro study.
    Sicilia E; Lagreca G; Papaspyridakos P; Finkelman M; Cobo J; Att W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1126-1134. PubMed ID: 36828728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of impression-making methods in edentulous arches: An in vitro study encompassing conventional and digital methods.
    Li J; Moon HS; Kim JH; Yoon HI; Oh KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 33583617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.
    Dohiem MM; Abdelaziz MS; Abdalla MF; Fawzy AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):486. PubMed ID: 36371189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feasibility of Using a Prosthetic-Based Impression Template to Improve the Trueness and Precision of a Complete Arch Digital Impression on Four and Six Implants: An In Vitro Study.
    Tallarico M; Lumbau AI; Scrascia R; Demelas G; Sanseverino F; Amarena R; Meloni SM
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Aug; 13(16):. PubMed ID: 32796635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature].
    Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Enhancing intraoral scanner accuracy using scan aid for multiple implants in the edentulous arch: An in vivo study.
    Kernen F; Brändle D; Wagendorf O; Recca M; Mehrhof J; Vach K; Nahles S; Nelson K; Flügge T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Aug; 34(8):793-801. PubMed ID: 37314046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
    Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques.
    Alsharbaty MHM; Alikhasi M; Zarrati S; Shamshiri AR
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):e902-e908. PubMed ID: 29423969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital vs Conventional Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Chen YW; Kotina E; Natto Z; Kang K; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):660-678. PubMed ID: 32613641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study.
    Amin S; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1360-1367. PubMed ID: 28039903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions.
    Rutkunas V; Gedrimiene A; Akulauskas M; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Jegelevicius D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1444-1454. PubMed ID: 34543478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-An in vitro study.
    Iturrate M; Eguiraun H; Solaberrieta E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1250-1258. PubMed ID: 31610069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillofacial prosthesis.
    Baghani MT; Neshati A; Sadafi M; Shidfar S
    J Family Med Prim Care; 2023 Mar; 12(3):446-451. PubMed ID: 37122657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners.
    Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.