These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37663211)

  • 21. The impact of fissure depth and enamel conditioning protocols on glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealant penetration.
    Markovic D; Petrovic B; Peric T; Miletic I; Andjelkovic S
    J Adhes Dent; 2011 Apr; 13(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 21594230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative Evaluation of the Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Three Filled Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Subpressure and Adhesive System: An Experimental Analysis.
    Waghmode SK; Devendrappa SN; Hadakar SG; Gaonkar NN; Gugawad S; Taur S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 16(Suppl 1):S97-S100. PubMed ID: 37663217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
    Antonson SA; Antonson DE; Brener S; Crutchfield J; Larumbe J; Michaud C; Yazici AR; Hardigan PC; Alempour S; Evans D; Ocanto R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wear behavior of different materials used for pit and fissure sealing.
    Kopuz D; Yaşa B; Hatirli H
    Am J Dent; 2023 Dec; 36(6):281-286. PubMed ID: 38092746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Caries-Preventive Effect and Retention of Glass-Ionomer and Resin-Based Sealants: A Randomized Clinical Comparative Evaluation.
    Uzel I; Gurlek C; Kuter B; Ertugrul F; Eden E
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():7205692. PubMed ID: 35769675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar.
    Gawali PN; Chaugule VB; Panse AM
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(4):291-295. PubMed ID: 28127158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27.
    Mittal S; Panwar PS; Rawal A; Mansuri M; Bagchi A; Pandey M; Surana P
    Bioinformation; 2024; 20(4):319-322. PubMed ID: 38854762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study.
    Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 18923223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Short-term retention of glass-ionomer fissure sealants.
    Torppa-Saarinen E; Seppä L
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1990; 86(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 2287613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.
    Kashbour W; Gupta P; Worthington HV; Boyers D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 11(11):CD003067. PubMed ID: 33142363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative Assessment of Retention and Caries Protective Effectiveness of a Hydrophilic and a Conventional Sealant-A Clinical Trial.
    Beresescu L; Pacurar M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Dako T; Petcu B; Eșian D
    Children (Basel); 2022 Apr; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 35626822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retention of Moisture-tolerant and Conventional Resin-based Sealant in Six- to Nine-year-old Children.
    Khatri SG; Samuel SR; Acharya S; Patil S; Madan K
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 26314605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of the retention of different pit and fissure sealants: a 1-year study.
    Kumaran P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 6(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 25206219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fluoride: Is It Worth to be added in Pit and Fissure Sealants?
    Prabhakar A; Dahake PT; Raju O; Basappa N
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012 Jan; 5(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25206126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative evaluation for microleakage between Fuji-VII glass ionomer cement and light-cured unfilled resin: a combined in vivo in vitro study.
    Ashwin R; Arathi R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2007; 25(2):86-7. PubMed ID: 17660643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant.
    Poulsen S; Beiruti N; Sadat N
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2001 Aug; 29(4):298-301. PubMed ID: 11515644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage, adaptation ability and clinical efficacy of two fluoride releasing fissure sealants.
    Marković D; Petrović B; Perić T; Blagojević D
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Apr; 69(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 22624423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison and Clinical Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Mandibular First Molars: An
    Smitha M; Paul ST; Nagaraj T; Khan AR; Rinu K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 31883249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant.
    Beresescu L; Kovacs M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Benedek C; Pop M; Bungardean D; Eșian D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year.
    Hassan AM; Mohammed SG
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 12(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 31571779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.