These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37663222)

  • 1. Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional
    Showkat I; Chaudhary S; Sinha AA; Manuja N; Telgi CR; Priya N; Kak MM
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 16(Suppl 1):S72-S76. PubMed ID: 37663222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of Chitosan/TiO
    Ibrahim MA; Meera Priyadarshini B; Neo J; Fawzy AS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Apr; 29(2):146-156. PubMed ID: 28190299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial and Adhesive Properties of Chitosan Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement: an In vitro Study.
    Debnath A; Kesavappa SB; Singh GP; Eshwar S; Jain V; Swamy M; Shetty P
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Mar; 11(3):ZC75-ZC78. PubMed ID: 28511515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Evaluation of Osteogenic Potential of Conventional Glass-ionomer Cement with Chitosan-modified Glass-ionomer and Bioactive Glass-modified Glass-ionomer Cement An
    Ranjani MS; Kavitha M; Venkatesh S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2021; 12(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 33967535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the Influence of Thermocycling on Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, and Microhardness in Green-Mediated Nanocomposite-Enhanced Glass Ionomer Cement Compared to Traditional Glass Ionomer Cement.
    Ravi B; Paulraj J; Maiti S; Shanmugam R
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56078. PubMed ID: 38618398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Cement and Chitosan-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vitro Study.
    Abraham D; Thomas AM; Chopra S; Koshy S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014 Jan; 7(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 25206230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical, antibacterial and bond strength properties of nano-titanium-enriched glass ionomer cement.
    Garcia-Contreras R; Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Contreras-Bulnes R; Sakagami H; Morales-Luckie RA; Nakajima H
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 26221928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Diametral Tensile Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and a Glass Hybrid Glass Ionomer Cement.
    Kunte S; Shah SB; Patil S; Shah P; Patel A; Chaudhary S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(4):398-401. PubMed ID: 36875971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles and Cetylpyridinium Chloride Enriched Glass-Ionomer Restorative Cement: A Comparative Study Assessing Compressive Strength and Antibacterial Activity.
    Hamid N; Telgi RL; Tirth A; Tandon V; Chandra S; Chaturvedi RK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(1):42-45. PubMed ID: 30289369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of antibacterial and adhesion properties of chitosan-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Ibrahim MA; Neo J; Esguerra RJ; Fawzy AS
    J Biomater Appl; 2015 Oct; 30(4):409-19. PubMed ID: 26079388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Miswak-Infused Glass Ionomer Cement: A Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Antibacterial Efficacy and Compressive Strength.
    Devi K; Paulraj J; Shanmugam R; Maiti S
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e53484. PubMed ID: 38440002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Zinc-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Type IX Cement: An
    Patil K; Patel A; Kunte S; Shah P; Kaur B; Paranna S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(4):381-389. PubMed ID: 33149411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical, antibacterial, biocompatible and microleakage evaluation of glass ionomer cement modified by nanohydroxyapatite/polyhexamethylene biguanide.
    Zhu K; Zheng L; Xing J; Chen S; Chen R; Ren L
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Apr; 41(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 34759126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of compressive and flexural strength, fluoride release and bacterial adhesion of GIC modified with CPP-ACP, bioactive glass, chitosan and MDPB.
    Kirthika N; Vidhya S; Sujatha V; Mahalaxmi S; Senthil Kumar R
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2021; 15(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 33927836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Green Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Properties and Compressive Strength of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticle-Incorporated Glass Ionomer Cement.
    Ilancheran P; Paulraj J; Maiti S; Shanmugam R
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58562. PubMed ID: 38770461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Evaluation of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Microhardness of Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer, and Type IX Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: An
    Bethapudy DR; Bhat C; Lakade L; Chaudhary S; Kunte S; Patil S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(2):175-181. PubMed ID: 37457201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chitosan-Reinforced Gelatin Microspheres-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC): A Novel Bone Alloplast Graft Material Synthesis and an In Vivo Analysis.
    Surendran S; Rohinikumar S; Eswaramoorthy R; M K; Nesappan T; Rp A
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50384. PubMed ID: 38213376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Incorporated with Nonfluoridated Remineralizing Agents.
    Mahalakshmi S; Chowdhary N; Shivanna V; Hema M; Karthikeyan N; Jayashankar CM
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Feb; 17(2):125-129. PubMed ID: 39184896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Compressive Resilience in Chirata and Terminalia arjuna Modified Glass Ionomer Cement.
    Devi K; Paulraj J; George RS; Shanmugam R; Maiti S
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52198. PubMed ID: 38347981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Type II Glass lonomer Cement, Type IX Glass lonomer Cement, and AMALGOMERâ„¢ Ceramic Reinforcement by Modified "Direct Contact Test": An in vitro Study.
    Hugar SM; Assudani HG; Patil V; Kukreja P; Uppin C; Thakkar P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 27365930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.