These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37663222)
21. Sol-gel-derived bioactive glass nanoparticle-incorporated glass ionomer cement with or without chitosan for enhanced mechanical and biomineralization properties. Kim DA; Lee JH; Jun SK; Kim HW; Eltohamy M; Lee HH Dent Mater; 2017 Jul; 33(7):805-817. PubMed ID: 28535954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the physical properties of glass ionomer modified with silver phosphate/hydroxyapatite or titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Pérez-Castro B; Flores-Ledesma A; Rubio-Rosas E; Teutle-Coyotecatl B; Flores-Ferreyra BI; Argueta-Figueroa L; Moyaho-Bernal MLA J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Jul; 48(4):160-167. PubMed ID: 39087226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Compressive Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with TiO Ivanišević A; Rajić VB; Pilipović A; Par M; Ivanković H; Baraba A Materials (Basel); 2021 Aug; 14(17):. PubMed ID: 34501056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An Somani R; Jaidka S; Singh DJ; Sibal GK Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(3):192-196. PubMed ID: 27843248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the Flexural Strength, Water Sorption, and Solubility of a Glass Ionomer Dental Cement Modified Using Phytomedicine. Singer L; Bierbaum G; Kehl K; Bourauel C Materials (Basel); 2020 Nov; 13(23):. PubMed ID: 33255839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Physical property investigation of contemporary glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Moberg M; Brewster J; Nicholson J; Roberts H Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1295-1308. PubMed ID: 29998443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Flexural Strength of GC Gold Hybrid, GIC Conventional and Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cement. Malhotra S; Bhullar KK; Kaur S; Malhotra M; Kaur R; Handa A J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S214-S216. PubMed ID: 36110748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Comparative Evaluation of Sorption, Solubility, and Compressive Strength of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements in Artificial Saliva: An Bhatia HP; Singh S; Sood S; Sharma N Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 10(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28377656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study. Jaidka S; Somani R; Singh DJ; Shafat S J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Apr; 6(Suppl 1):S64-9. PubMed ID: 27195231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Compressive Strength of Ginger and Clove-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement. Paulraj J; Pushparathna B; Maiti S; Sharma N; Shanmugam R Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e55964. PubMed ID: 38601383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative Analysis of Color Stability and Its Impact on Artificial Aging: An In Vitro Study of Bioactive Chitosan, Titanium, Zirconia, and Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticle-Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement Compared With Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement. E DS; Paulraj J; Maiti S; Shanmugam R Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54517. PubMed ID: 38516425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of glass ionomer cement added with propolis, chitosan, and chlorhexidine against Neelima B; Reddy JS; Singh PT; Suhasini K; Hemachandrika I; Hasanuddin S J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2020; 38(4):367-373. PubMed ID: 33402619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mechanical and dentin bond strength properties of the nanosilver enriched glass ionomer cement. Jowkar Z; Jowkar M; Shafiei F J Clin Exp Dent; 2019 Mar; 11(3):e275-e281. PubMed ID: 31001399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Self-cure, Dual-cure, and Light-cure Glass Ionomer Cements in a Simulated Oral Environment: An Chandru TP; Chandran S; Peedikayil FC; Kottayi S; Aparna TP; Aravind A Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(5):707-710. PubMed ID: 38162236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative Evaluation of Microhardness and Solubility of Different Combinations of Antibiotic Powders Added to Glass Ionomer Cement: An Benson TL; Sogi S; Jain M; Shahi P; Dhir S; Shaju JC Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Jun; 17(6):619-624. PubMed ID: 39391132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of Adhesive Bond Strength, and the Sustained Release of Fluoride by Chitosan-infused Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An Patel A; Dhupar JK; Jajoo SS; Shah P; Chaudhary S Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(2):254-257. PubMed ID: 34413602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Anti-Bacterial effect, fluoride release, and compressive strength of a glass ionomer containing silver and titanium nanoparticles. Wassel MO; Allam GG Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(1):75-79. PubMed ID: 35946249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of Fluoride Release in Chitosan-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements. Nishanthine C; Miglani R; R I; Poorni S; Srinivasan MR; Robaian A; Albar NHM; Alhaidary SFR; Binalrimal S; Almalki A; Vinothkumar TS; Dewan H; Radwan W; Mirza MB; Bhandi S; Patil S Int Dent J; 2022 Dec; 72(6):785-791. PubMed ID: 35810014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Flexural Strength of Glass Carbomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Stored in Different Storage Media over Time. Faridi MA; Khabeer A; Haroon S Med Princ Pract; 2018; 27(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29723852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]