These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37664000)

  • 21. Midwifery Education Institutions in Italy Creation and Validation of Clinical Preceptors' Assessment Tool: Students' and Expert Midwives' Views.
    Mauri PA; Cortinovis I; Guerrini Contini NN; Soldi M
    Nurs Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 34968362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How do Slovenian women perceive midwifery competencies - Pilot study using the Slovenian version of midwifery profiling questionnaire (MidProQ).
    Mivšek AP; Vermeulen J
    Midwifery; 2023 Mar; 118():103601. PubMed ID: 36680961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and Psychometric Validation of the Perinatal Bereavement Care Competence Scale for Midwives.
    Shen Q; Luo X; Feng X; Gao Y
    Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci); 2022 Aug; 16(3):180-186. PubMed ID: 35716897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Midwives' views on appropriate antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: do they match clients' preferences?
    Martin L; Hutton EK; Spelten ER; Gitsels-van der Wal JT; van Dulmen S
    Midwifery; 2014 Jun; 30(6):600-9. PubMed ID: 24100043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Midwives' perceptions of women's preferences related to midwifery care in Germany: A focus group study.
    Lohmann S; Mattern E; Ayerle GM
    Midwifery; 2018 Jun; 61():53-62. PubMed ID: 29529579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Where midwives are not yet recognised: a feasibility study of professional midwives in Nepal.
    Bogren MU; van Teijlingen E; Berg M
    Midwifery; 2013 Oct; 29(10):1103-9. PubMed ID: 23962636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Midwives' views of caseload midwifery - comparing the caseload and non-caseload midwives' opinions. A cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives.
    Newton M; Dawson K; Forster D; McLachlan H
    Women Birth; 2021 Feb; 34(1):e47-e56. PubMed ID: 32653395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Midwives' and women's views on digital midwifery care in Germany: Results from an online survey.
    Hertle D; Wende D; Schumacher L; Bauer NH
    Midwifery; 2022 Dec; 115():103472. PubMed ID: 36191383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors defining the mentoring competencies of clinical midwives: An exploratory quantitative research study in Japan.
    Hishinuma Y; Horiuchi S; Yanai H
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Jan; 36():330-6. PubMed ID: 26372609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Facilitators and barriers influencing utilization of services provided by community midwives in district Thatta, Pakistan: a qualitative exploratory study.
    Khowaja BMH; Feroz AS; Saleem S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jun; 22(1):506. PubMed ID: 35733093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intrapartum Care Working Patterns of Midwives: The Long Road to Models of Care in Germany.
    Gross MM; Michelsen C; Vaske B; Helbig S
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2018 Apr; 222(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 29341048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How do nurses and midwives perceive their preparedness for quality improvement and patient safety in practice? A cross-sectional national study in Ireland.
    Gallen A; Kodate N; Casey D
    Nurse Educ Today; 2019 May; 76():125-130. PubMed ID: 30784840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Midwives' attitudes towards supporting normal labour and birth - A cross-sectional study in South Germany.
    Zinsser LA; Stoll K; Gross MM
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():98-102. PubMed ID: 27321726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sexual and reproductive health education: Midwives' confidence and practices.
    Bradfield Z; Officer K; Barnes C; Mignacca E; Butt J; Hauck Y
    Women Birth; 2022 Jul; 35(4):360-366. PubMed ID: 34535424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of a scale to evaluate midwives' beliefs about assessing alcohol use during pregnancy.
    Watkins RE; Payne JM; Reibel T; Jones HM; Wilkins A; Mutch R; Bower C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Dec; 15():353. PubMed ID: 26715154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of a tool to measure holistic reflection in midwifery students and midwives.
    Bass J; Sidebotham M; Sweet L; Creedy DK
    Women Birth; 2022 Sep; 35(5):e502-e511. PubMed ID: 34666952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Midwives' empathy and shared decision making from women's perspective - sensitivity of an assessment to compare quality of care in prenatal and obstetric care.
    Schulz AA; Wirtz MA
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):717. PubMed ID: 36127645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The translation and psychometric assessment of the perception of empowerment in midwifery scale: the Persian version.
    Hajiesmaello M; Kariman N; Sharif Nia H; Ozgoli G; Hajian S; Bazzazian S; Mokhtarian-Gilani T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 May; 20(1):466. PubMed ID: 32456630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genomic Literacy of Registered Nurses and Midwives in Australia: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
    Wright H; Zhao L; Birks M; Mills J
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 Jan; 51(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 30367730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development and psychometric evaluation of Nurses and Midwives' Perceptions of their Roles in Primary Healthcare.
    Al-Dwaikat TN; Ta'an W; Alrawashdeh M; Baker NA; Al Ali NM
    Int J Nurs Sci; 2020 Oct; 7(4):460-465. PubMed ID: 33195759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.