These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37665717)

  • 1. Problems of Domain Factors with Small Factor Loadings in Bi-Factor Models.
    Petras N; Meiser T
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(1):123-147. PubMed ID: 37665717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small but Nontrivial: A Comparison of Six Strategies to Handle Cross-Loadings in Bifactor Predictive Models.
    Zhang B; Luo J; Sun T; Cao M; Drasgow F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):115-132. PubMed ID: 34357822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iteration of Partially Specified Target Matrices: Application to the Bi-Factor Case.
    Abad FJ; Garcia-Garzon E; Garrido LE; Barrada JR
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(4):416-429. PubMed ID: 28375697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What are the consequences of ignoring cross-loadings in bifactor models? A simulation study assessing parameter recovery and sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indices.
    Ximénez C; Revuelta J; Castañeda R
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():923877. PubMed ID: 36092049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploratory Bi-factor Analysis with Multiple General Factors.
    Jiménez M; Abad FJ; Garcia-Garzon E; Garrido LE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(6):1072-1089. PubMed ID: 37038725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.
    Burr H; Formazin M; Pohrt A
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2016 May; 42(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 26960179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parameter accuracy in meta-analyses of factor structures.
    Gnambs T; Staufenbiel T
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):168-86. PubMed ID: 27286902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Empirical Identification Issue of the Bifactor Item Response Theory Model.
    Chen W; Fujimoto KA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Nov; 46(8):675-689. PubMed ID: 36262525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On Omega Hierarchical Estimation: A Comparison of Exploratory Bi-Factor Analysis Algorithms.
    Garcia-Garzon E; Abad FJ; Garrido LE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(1):101-119. PubMed ID: 32449372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the equivalency of factor and network loadings.
    Christensen AP; Golino H
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1563-1580. PubMed ID: 33409985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A General Approach for Fitting Pure Exploratory Bifactor Models.
    Lorenzo-Seva U; Ferrando PJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 30160535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconsidering the Conditions for Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Ondé D; Alvarado JM
    Span J Psychol; 2020 Dec; 23():e55. PubMed ID: 33272349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An examination of effect estimation in factorial and standardly-tailored designs.
    Allore HG; Murphy TE
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 18375650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting Valid and Reliable Overall Scores and Domain Scores Using Bi-Factor Model.
    Liu Y; Li Z; Liu H
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):562-576. PubMed ID: 31534290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CFA Models with a General Factor and Multiple Sets of Secondary Factors.
    Jeon M; Rijmen F; Rabe-Hesketh S
    Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):785-808. PubMed ID: 30120699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size calculation and re-estimation based on the prevalence in a single-arm confirmatory diagnostic accuracy study.
    Stark M; Zapf A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2958-2971. PubMed ID: 32299298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Regularized Maximum-Likelihood, Regularized 2-Stage Least Squares, and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation with Misspecified Models, Small Samples, and Weak Factor Structure.
    Finch WH; Miller JE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(4):608-626. PubMed ID: 32324059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.