These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37666467)
1. In vitro study of the accuracy and efficiency of wireless intraoral scanners at various battery levels. Sombun S; Ongthiemsak C J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104686. PubMed ID: 37666467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study. Diker B; Tak Ö J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans. Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of intraoral scanners in different complete arch scan patterns. Pattamavilai S; Ongthiemsak C J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):155-162. PubMed ID: 35256181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study. Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study. Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Elter B; Tak Ö J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104729. PubMed ID: 37778497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces. Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104414. PubMed ID: 36640842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners. Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. Osman RB; Alharbi NM J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study. Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study. Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy. Revilla-León M; Gohil A; Barmak AB; Gómez-Polo M; Pérez-Barquero JA; Att W; Kois JC J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 35210107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship. Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Yilmaz B; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]