These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3766691)

  • 1. Should a central fusion stimulus be used on the disparometer?
    Sheedy JE
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Aug; 63(8):627-30. PubMed ID: 3766691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the presence of a central fusion lock effect on fixation disparity curve parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Mirzaeian M; Hashemi H; Narooie-Noori F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Sardari S; Ostadimoghaddam H; Doostdar A; Khabazkhoob M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jul; 104(5):617-624. PubMed ID: 33751916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of a central fusion stimulus on fixation disparity.
    Debysingh SJ; Orzech PL; Sheedy JE
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Apr; 63(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 3706482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of fixation disparity curve variables measured with the Sheedy Disparometer and the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card.
    Goss DA; Patel J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):580-8. PubMed ID: 8539027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement of Fixation Disparity Curve between Two Different Instruments.
    Hashemi H; Mirzaeian M; Narooie F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Ostadimoghaddam H; Sardari S; Khabazkhoob M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jun; 98(6):629-635. PubMed ID: 34081653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of illumination and foveal fusion lock on clinical fixation disparity measurements with the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Wildsoet CF; Cameron KD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 4022649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurements of objective and subjective fixation disparity with and without a central fusion stimulus.
    Brautaset RL; Jennings JA
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Feb; 12(2):MT1-4. PubMed ID: 16449958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of disparometer fixation disparity curves as measured with and without the phoropter.
    Frantz KA; Scharre JE
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Feb; 67(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 2336250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dependence of Panum's fusional area on local retinal stimulation.
    Diner DB; Fender DH
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1988 Jul; 5(7):1163-9. PubMed ID: 3418429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vertical fixation disparity curve and the effects of vergence training in a normal young adult population.
    Luu CD; Green JF; Abel L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 77(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 11147736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Fixation disparity in peripheral and central binocular vision under conditions of prismatic heterophoria (author's transl)].
    Monje M; Stingl H; de Decker W
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1975; 194(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 1080371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peripheral stimulation and human cyclofusional response.
    Sullivan MJ; Kertesz AE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1979 Dec; 18(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 511471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined effects of spatial frequency and retinal eccentricity upon fixation disparity.
    Schor C; Wesson M; Robertson KM
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Aug; 63(8):619-26. PubMed ID: 3766690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of stimulus size on fusion and vergence.
    Kertesz AE
    J Opt Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 71(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 7218073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative strength of central and peripheral fusion as a function of stimulus parameters.
    Cooper J; Feldman JM; Eichler R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Dec; 69(12):966-72. PubMed ID: 1300521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of fixation disparity measurements obtained with the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Dittemore D; Crum J; Kirschen D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 8515972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of stimulus parameters on fusional and stereoscopic performance.
    Boman DK; Kertesz AE
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Mar; 62(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 3985116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of accommodative convergence at the limits of fusional vergence.
    Semmlow JL; Heerema D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1979 Sep; 18(9):970-6. PubMed ID: 478785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.
    Brownlee GA; Goss DA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3403890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.