These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37667857)

  • 1. The Intergroup Value Protection Model: A Theoretically Integrative and Dynamic Approach to Intergroup Conflict Escalation in Democratic Societies.
    van Zomeren M; d'Amore C; Pauls IL; Shuman E; Leal A
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2024 May; 28(2):225-248. PubMed ID: 37667857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The process of becoming 'we' in an intergroup conflict context: How enhancing intergroup moral similarities leads to common-ingroup identity.
    Čehajić-Clancy S; Janković A; Opačin N; Bilewicz M
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2023 Jul; 62(3):1251-1270. PubMed ID: 36752323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disappointment expression evokes collective guilt and collective action in intergroup conflict: the moderating role of legitimacy perceptions.
    Solak N; Reifen Tagar M; Cohen-Chen S; Saguy T; Halperin E
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Sep; 31(6):1112-1126. PubMed ID: 27351316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitude Moralization Within Polarized Contexts: An Emotional Value-Protective Response to Dyadic Harm Cues.
    D'Amore C; van Zomeren M; Koudenburg N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1566-1579. PubMed ID: 34609235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How perceived polarization predicts attitude moralization (and vice versa): A four-wave longitudinal study during the 2020 U.S. election.
    D'Amore C; van Zomeren M; Koudenburg N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2024 Apr; 126(4):624-642. PubMed ID: 38386365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of bystander intentions and social-moral reasoning about intergroup verbal aggression.
    Palmer SB; Rutland A; Cameron L
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2015 Nov; 33(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 26058823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On conviction's collective consequences: integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action.
    van Zomeren M; Postmes T; Spears R
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):52-71. PubMed ID: 22435846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Justice reactions to deviant ingroup members: Ingroup identity threat motivates utilitarian punishments.
    Fousiani K; Yzerbyt V; Kteily NS; Demoulin S
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 58(4):869-893. PubMed ID: 30648270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is Online Moral Outrage Outrageous? Rethinking the Indignation Machine.
    Mihailov E; Voinea C; Vică C
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 Mar; 29(2):12. PubMed ID: 37000374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When does activating diversity alleviate, when does it increase intergroup bias? An ingroup projection perspective.
    Steffens MC; Reese G; Ehrke F; Jonas KJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178738. PubMed ID: 28582443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: an integrative approach.
    Skitka LJ; Bauman CW; Mullen E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Jun; 30(6):743-56. PubMed ID: 15155038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenges to Traditional Narratives of Intractable Conflict Decrease Ingroup Glorification.
    McLamore Q; Adelman L; Leidner B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1702-1716. PubMed ID: 30975037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A model of the ingroup as a social resource.
    Correll J; Park B
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2005; 9(4):341-59. PubMed ID: 16223356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Shadows of the Past: Effects of Historical Group Trauma on Current Intergroup Conflicts.
    Schori-Eyal N; Klar Y; Roccas S; McNeill A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Apr; 43(4):538-554. PubMed ID: 28903663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social psychological research on prejudice as collective action supporting emergent ingroup members.
    Ferguson MA; Branscombe NR; Reynolds KJ
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Jan; 58(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 30446999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motive attribution asymmetry for love vs. hate drives intractable conflict.
    Waytz A; Young LL; Ginges J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Nov; 111(44):15687-92. PubMed ID: 25331879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where the Blame Lies: Unpacking Groups Into Their Constituent Subgroups Shifts Judgments of Blame in Intergroup Conflict.
    Halevy N; Maoz I; Vani P; Reit ES
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 33(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 34846949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rejecting ingroup loyalty for the truth: Children's and adolescents' evaluations of deviant peers within a misinformation intergroup context.
    Farooq A; Adlam A; Rutland A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2024 Jul; 243():105923. PubMed ID: 38593709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Context differences in children's ingroup preferences.
    Mulvey KL; Hitti A; Rutland A; Abrams D; Killen M
    Dev Psychol; 2014 May; 50(5):1507-19. PubMed ID: 24491215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is Martin Luther King or Malcolm X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups' reactions to low-status groups' collective action.
    Teixeira CP; Spears R; Yzerbyt VY
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 May; 118(5):919-944. PubMed ID: 31169387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.