155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37668109)
1. Clinical performance of monolithic zirconia crowns on titanium-zirconium reduced-diameter implants in the molar area: Interim data at three years of a randomized controlled trial.
Zumstein K; Waller T; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Benic G; Mühlemann S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1354-1362. PubMed ID: 37668109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prosthetic outcomes and clinical performance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia versus porcelain-fused-to-metal implant crowns in the molar region: 1-year results of a RCT.
Mühlemann S; Lakha T; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Sep; 31(9):856-864. PubMed ID: 32562324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns Supported by Narrow or Standard Diameter Titanium-zirconium Implants in Posterior Sites: One-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Alsabeeha NHM; Amir-Rad F; Ma S; Shah M; Hannawi H; Tawse-Smith A; Duncan WJ; Baqain ZH; Atieh MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 May; 0(0):1-23. PubMed ID: 38728047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peri-implant marginal bone changes with implant-supported metal-ceramic or monolithic zirconia single crowns: A retrospective clinical study of 1 to 5 years.
Shen XT; Li JY; Luo X; Feng Y; Gai LT; He FM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):368-374. PubMed ID: 33618860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months.
Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function.
Sailer I; Zembic A; Jung RE; Siegenthaler D; Holderegger C; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19397632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions.
Zembic A; Bösch A; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Apr; 24(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 23025514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screw-retained monolithic zirconia vs. cemented porcelain-fused-to-metal implant crowns: a prospective randomized clinical trial in split-mouth design.
Weigl P; Saarepera K; Hinrikus K; Wu Y; Trimpou G; Lorenz J
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 29946832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 3-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
Ioannidis A; Gallucci GO; Jung RE; Borzangy S; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Nov; 42(11):1060-70. PubMed ID: 26440201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant-Supported Extra-Orally Cemented Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study up to 18 Months in Function.
Cakan U; Özcan M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2022 Nov; 30(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 35439372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE
Mangano F; Margiani B; Admakin O
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results.
Zembic A; Sailer I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):802-8. PubMed ID: 19486077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. All-ceramic, bi-layered crowns supported by zirconia implants: Three-year results of a prospective multicenter study.
Spies BC; Balmer M; Jung RE; Sailer I; Vach K; Kohal RJ
J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():58-65. PubMed ID: 28939484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery: a 1-year randomised controlled trial.
Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 25237669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artefacts of implant-supported single crowns - Impact of material composition on artefact volume on dental MRI.
Hilgenfeld T; Prager M; Schwindling FS; Heil A; Kuchenbecker S; Rammelsberg P; Bendszus M; Heiland S
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(3):301-308. PubMed ID: 27722227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Zirconia implants: a promising alternative to titanium?
Bradley H; Owen B; Keys W
Evid Based Dent; 2021 Jan; 22(3):102-103. PubMed ID: 34561660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review.
Sadowsky SJ
Dent Mater; 2020 Jan; 36(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31500904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial.
Joda T; Brägger U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1401-1406. PubMed ID: 27796072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
