These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37668112)

  • 1. Anticipating anthropogenic threats in acquiring new protected areas.
    Albers HJ; Chang CH; Dissanayake STM; Helmstedt KJ; Kroetz K; Dilkina B; Zapata-Mor An I; Nolte C; Ochoa-Ochoa LM; Spencer G
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14176. PubMed ID: 37668112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying biases in marine-protected-area placement relative to abatable threats.
    Kuempel CD; Jones KR; Watson JEM; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 31131932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for spatial heterogeneity in the added conservation value of land protection when prioritizing protected areas.
    Yoon HS; Vijay V; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13960. PubMed ID: 35661264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
    Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the presence of marine protected areas against their ability to reduce pressures on biodiversity.
    Stevenson SL; Woolley SNC; Barnett J; Dunstan P
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):622-631. PubMed ID: 31667866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of protected areas to avian persistence across 20 years of climate and land-use change.
    Peach MA; Cohen JB; Frair JL; Zuckerberg B; Sullivan P; Porter WF; Lang C
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):423-433. PubMed ID: 30113109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A conservation planning approach to mitigate the impacts of leakage from protected area networks.
    Bode M; Tulloch AI; Mills M; Venter O; Ando AW
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):765-74. PubMed ID: 25494874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rewilding in the face of climate change.
    Carroll C; Noss RF
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Feb; 35(1):155-167. PubMed ID: 32557877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conservation planning on China's borders with Myanmar, Laos, and Vietnam.
    Wang L; Yang B; Bai Y; Lu X; Corlett RT; Tan Y; Chen XY; Zhu J; Liu Y; Quan RC
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1797-1808. PubMed ID: 33749881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defining the balance point between conservation and development.
    Tian D; Xie Y; Barnosky AD; Wei F
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 30225849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating surrogates of genetic diversity for conservation planning.
    Hanson JO; Veríssimo A; Velo-Antón G; Marques A; Camacho-Sanchez M; Martínez-Solano Í; Gonçalves H; Sequeira F; Possingham HP; Carvalho SB
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):634-642. PubMed ID: 32761662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Threats to marine biodiversity in European protected areas.
    Mazaris AD; Kallimanis A; Gissi E; Pipitone C; Danovaro R; Claudet J; Rilov G; Badalamenti F; Stelzenmüller V; Thiault L; Benedetti-Cecchi L; Goriup P; Katsanevakis S; Fraschetti S
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 677():418-426. PubMed ID: 31059884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying global conservation priorities for terrestrial vertebrates based on multiple dimensions of biodiversity.
    Cui Y; Carmona CP; Wang Z
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Jun; 38(3):e14205. PubMed ID: 37855155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving effectiveness of systematic conservation planning with density data.
    Veloz S; Salas L; Altman B; Alexander J; Jongsomjit D; Elliott N; Ballard G
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1217-1227. PubMed ID: 25873240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How threats inform conservation planning-A systematic review protocol.
    Virtanen EA; Söderholm M; Moilanen A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0269107. PubMed ID: 35639722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient and equitable design of marine protected areas in Fiji through inclusion of stakeholder-specific objectives in conservation planning.
    Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Ban NC; Álvarez-Romero JG; Jupiter S; Adams VM
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1378-89. PubMed ID: 25916976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing efficiency and resilience of no-take marine protected areas for fish conservation under climate change along the coastlines of China Seas.
    Lin L; Liu Y; Yan Y; Kang B
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14174. PubMed ID: 37650435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing spatial conservation prioritization methods with site- versus spatial dependency-based connectivity.
    Muenzel D; Critchell K; Cox C; Campbell SJ; Jakub R; Chollett I; Krueck N; Holstein D; Treml EA; Beger M
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Apr; 37(2):e14008. PubMed ID: 36178033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring the nature of anthropogenic threats from long-term abundance records.
    Shoemaker KT; Akçakaya HR
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):238-49. PubMed ID: 25065712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.