178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37669643)
1. Is it possible to 3D bioprint load-bearing bone implants? A critical review.
Gupta T; Ghosh SB; Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh S; Sain M
Biofabrication; 2023 Sep; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 37669643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advancing bioinks for 3D bioprinting using reactive fillers: A review.
Heid S; Boccaccini AR
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 113():1-22. PubMed ID: 32622053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D Printing and Biofabrication for Load Bearing Tissue Engineering.
Jeong CG; Atala A
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2015; 881():3-14. PubMed ID: 26545741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marine-derived natural polymer-based bioprinting ink for biocompatible, durable, and controllable 3D constructs.
Park TY; Yang YJ; Ha DH; Cho DW; Cha HJ
Biofabrication; 2019 Apr; 11(3):035001. PubMed ID: 30831562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An insight into cell-laden 3D-printed constructs for bone tissue engineering.
Swetha S; Lavanya K; Sruthi R; Selvamurugan N
J Mater Chem B; 2020 Nov; 8(43):9836-9862. PubMed ID: 33030166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Converging functionality: Strategies for 3D hybrid-construct biofabrication and the role of composite biomaterials for skeletal regeneration.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Acta Biomater; 2021 Sep; 132():188-216. PubMed ID: 33713862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomaterial-based 3D bioprinting strategy for orthopedic tissue engineering.
Chae S; Cho DW
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():4-20. PubMed ID: 35963520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair.
Zhang L; Yang G; Johnson BN; Jia X
Acta Biomater; 2019 Jan; 84():16-33. PubMed ID: 30481607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. From 3D printing to 3D bioprinting: the material properties of polymeric material and its derived bioink for achieving tissue specific architectures.
Vrana NE; Gupta S; Mitra K; Rizvanov AA; Solovyeva VV; Antmen E; Salehi M; Ehterami A; Pourchet L; Barthes J; Marquette CA; von Unge M; Wang CY; Lai PL; Bit A
Cell Tissue Bank; 2022 Sep; 23(3):417-440. PubMed ID: 35000046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Adamek P; Paul GR; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 114():307-322. PubMed ID: 32673752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model.
Liu B; Li J; Lei X; Cheng P; Song Y; Gao Y; Hu J; Wang C; Zhang S; Li D; Wu H; Sang H; Bi L; Pei G
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Jul; 112():110905. PubMed ID: 32409059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward 3D Bioprinting of Osseous Tissue of Predefined Shape Using Single-Matrix Cell-Bioink Constructs.
Gu Y; Pigeot S; Ahrens L; Tribukait-Riemenschneider F; Sarem M; Wolf F; García-García A; Barbero A; Martin I; Shastri VP
Adv Healthc Mater; 2023 Apr; 12(9):e2202550. PubMed ID: 36527264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.
Marques CF; Diogo GS; Pina S; Oliveira JM; Silva TH; Reis RL
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Mar; 30(3):32. PubMed ID: 30840132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a novel alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite hydrogel for 3D bioprinting bone tissue engineered scaffolds.
Bendtsen ST; Quinnell SP; Wei M
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2017 May; 105(5):1457-1468. PubMed ID: 28187519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Egg white improves the biological properties of an alginate-methylcellulose bioink for 3D bioprinting of volumetric bone constructs.
Liu S; Kilian D; Ahlfeld T; Hu Q; Gelinsky M
Biofabrication; 2023 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 36735961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D Bioprinting of Human Tissues: Biofabrication, Bioinks, and Bioreactors.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Rubert M; Müller R
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33921417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bio-inspired hydrogel composed of hyaluronic acid and alginate as a potential bioink for 3D bioprinting of articular cartilage engineering constructs.
Antich C; de Vicente J; Jiménez G; Chocarro C; Carrillo E; Montañez E; Gálvez-Martín P; Marchal JA
Acta Biomater; 2020 Apr; 106():114-123. PubMed ID: 32027992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Printability' of Candidate Biomaterials for Extrusion Based 3D Printing: State-of-the-Art.
Kyle S; Jessop ZM; Al-Sabah A; Whitaker IS
Adv Healthc Mater; 2017 Aug; 6(16):. PubMed ID: 28558161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ECM Based Bioink for Tissue Mimetic 3D Bioprinting.
Nam SY; Park SH
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1064():335-353. PubMed ID: 30471042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
