133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37670428)
1. Software Application Profile: dynamicLM-a tool for performing dynamic risk prediction using a landmark supermodel for survival data under competing risks.
Fries AH; Choi E; Wu JT; Lee JH; Ding VY; Huang RJ; Liang SY; Wakelee HA; Wilkens LR; Cheng I; Han SS
Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Dec; 52(6):1984-1989. PubMed ID: 37670428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individual dynamic prediction of clinical endpoint from large dimensional longitudinal biomarker history: a landmark approach.
Devaux A; Genuer R; Peres K; Proust-Lima C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):188. PubMed ID: 35818025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic prediction of competing risk events using landmark sub-distribution hazard model with multiple longitudinal biomarkers.
Wu C; Li L; Li R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3179-3191. PubMed ID: 32419611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive abilities comparison from multiple dynamic prediction models.
Moreau C; Riou J; Roux M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Sep; 32(9):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 37489243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic prediction by landmarking in competing risks.
Nicolaie MA; van Houwelingen JC; de Witte TM; Putter H
Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(12):2031-47. PubMed ID: 23086627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic pseudo-observations: a robust approach to dynamic prediction in competing risks.
Nicolaie MA; van Houwelingen JC; de Witte TM; Putter H
Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):1043-52. PubMed ID: 23865523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying and estimating the predictive accuracy for censored time-to-event data with competing risks.
Wu C; Li L
Stat Med; 2018 Sep; 37(21):3106-3124. PubMed ID: 29766537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying and comparing dynamic predictive accuracy of joint models for longitudinal marker and time-to-event in presence of censoring and competing risks.
Blanche P; Proust-Lima C; Loubère L; Berr C; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):102-113. PubMed ID: 25311240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tackling dynamic prediction of death in patients with recurrent cardiovascular events.
Liang M; Li Z; Li L; Chinchilli VM; Zhang L; Wang M
Stat Med; 2023 Aug; 42(19):3487-3507. PubMed ID: 37282984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing predictions among competing risks models with time-dependent covariates.
Cortese G; Gerds TA; Andersen PK
Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(18):3089-101. PubMed ID: 23494745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical models versus machine learning for competing risks: development and validation of prognostic models.
Kantidakis G; Putter H; Litière S; Fiocco M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 36829145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancing long-term survival prediction with two short-term events: Landmarking with a flexible varying coefficient model.
Li W; Wang Q; Ning J; Zhang J; Li Z; Savitz SI; Tahanan A; Rahbar MH
Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(13):2607-2621. PubMed ID: 38664221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Boosting for high-dimensional time-to-event data with competing risks.
Binder H; Allignol A; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J
Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 25(7):890-6. PubMed ID: 19244389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Competing risks and time-dependent covariates.
Cortese G; Andersen PK
Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):138-58. PubMed ID: 20029852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semiparametric competing risks regression under interval censoring using the R package intccr.
Park J; Bakoyannis G; Yiannoutsos CT
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 May; 173():167-176. PubMed ID: 31046992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of discrete time-to-event prediction models in the presence of competing risks.
Heyard R; Timsit JF; Held L;
Biom J; 2020 May; 62(3):643-657. PubMed ID: 31368172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Joint and Landmark Modeling for Predicting Cancer Progression in Men With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Post Hoc Analysis of the PREVAIL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Finelli A; Beer TM; Chowdhury S; Evans CP; Fizazi K; Higano CS; Kim J; Martin L; Saad F; Saarela O
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jun; 4(6):e2112426. PubMed ID: 34129025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What Is the Effect of Using a Competing-risks Estimator when Predicting Survivorship After Joint Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Approaches to Survivorship Estimation in a Large Registry.
Cuthbert AR; Graves SE; Giles LC; Glonek G; Pratt N
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Feb; 479(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 33105301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. causalCmprsk: An R package for nonparametric and Cox-based estimation of average treatment effects in competing risks data.
Vakulenko-Lagun B; Magdamo C; Charpignon ML; Zheng B; Albers MW; Das S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Dec; 242():107819. PubMed ID: 37774426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The mstate package for estimation and prediction in non- and semi-parametric multi-state and competing risks models.
de Wreede LC; Fiocco M; Putter H
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 Sep; 99(3):261-74. PubMed ID: 20227129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
