BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3767222)

  • 1. Clinical use of an insert earphone.
    Clemis JD; Ballad WJ; Killion MC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):520-4. PubMed ID: 3767222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference equivalent threshold levels for pure tones and 1/3-oct noise bands: insert earphone and TDH-49 earphone.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 3950196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
    Munro KJ; Toal S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?
    Munro KJ; Salisbury VA
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):408-13. PubMed ID: 12403609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Etymotic insert and TDH supra-aural earphones in auditory brainstem response measurement.
    Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Hall JW; Peek BF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Sep; 3(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 1421467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Shera CA; Peake WT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65. PubMed ID: 10738809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical comparison of Grason Stadler insert earphones and TDH-50P standard earphones.
    Blackwell KL; Oyler RF; Seyfried DN
    Ear Hear; 1991 Oct; 12(5):361-2. PubMed ID: 1783242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry.
    Borton TE; Nolen BL; Luks SB; Meline NC
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 2930364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing aid coupler output level variability and coupler correction levels for insert earphones.
    Frank T; Richards WD
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 1916048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds.
    Frank T; Williams DL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 8318711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attenuation values for a supra-aural earphone for children and insert earphone for children and adults.
    Wright DC; Frank T
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):454-9. PubMed ID: 1487107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.
    Berger EH; Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Phantom responses and early auditory evoked potentials. Comparison of the TDH39 hearing aid and an intra-canal hearing device].
    Jezequel JA
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1995; 112(4):151-7. PubMed ID: 7574242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaural attenuation using etymotic ER-3A insert earphones in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Peek BF
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 2307307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insert earphones for audiometry: applications, advantages, and limitations.
    Luks SB; Borton TE; Nolen BL
    Entechnology; 1989 Sep; ():21-2, 24, 28-30. PubMed ID: 2692634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.