These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3767222)

  • 1. Clinical use of an insert earphone.
    Clemis JD; Ballad WJ; Killion MC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):520-4. PubMed ID: 3767222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference equivalent threshold levels for pure tones and 1/3-oct noise bands: insert earphone and TDH-49 earphone.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 3950196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
    Munro KJ; Toal S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?
    Munro KJ; Salisbury VA
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):408-13. PubMed ID: 12403609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Etymotic insert and TDH supra-aural earphones in auditory brainstem response measurement.
    Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Hall JW; Peek BF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Sep; 3(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 1421467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Shera CA; Peake WT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65. PubMed ID: 10738809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical comparison of Grason Stadler insert earphones and TDH-50P standard earphones.
    Blackwell KL; Oyler RF; Seyfried DN
    Ear Hear; 1991 Oct; 12(5):361-2. PubMed ID: 1783242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry.
    Borton TE; Nolen BL; Luks SB; Meline NC
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 2930364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing aid coupler output level variability and coupler correction levels for insert earphones.
    Frank T; Richards WD
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 1916048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds.
    Frank T; Williams DL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 8318711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attenuation values for a supra-aural earphone for children and insert earphone for children and adults.
    Wright DC; Frank T
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):454-9. PubMed ID: 1487107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.
    Berger EH; Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Phantom responses and early auditory evoked potentials. Comparison of the TDH39 hearing aid and an intra-canal hearing device].
    Jezequel JA
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1995; 112(4):151-7. PubMed ID: 7574242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaural attenuation using etymotic ER-3A insert earphones in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Peek BF
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 2307307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insert earphones for audiometry: applications, advantages, and limitations.
    Luks SB; Borton TE; Nolen BL
    Entechnology; 1989 Sep; ():21-2, 24, 28-30. PubMed ID: 2692634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.