BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3767222)

  • 21. Efficacy of earphones for 12- to 24-month-old children during visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Weiss AD; Karzon RK; Ead B; Lieu JE
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 26903087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interaural attenuation using insert earphones: electrocochleographic approach.
    Sobhy OA; Gould HJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Mar; 4(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 8471788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Merchant SN; Thornton AR; Shera CA; Peake WT
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10981602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coupling of earphones to human ears and to standard coupler.
    Cirić DG; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2096-107. PubMed ID: 17069307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationship between transducer type and low-frequency hearing loss for patients with ventilation tubes.
    Tokar-Prejna S; Meinzen-Derr J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1063-7. PubMed ID: 16364457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones.
    Lindgren F
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of tubing length and coupling method on hearing threshold and real-ear to coupler difference measures.
    Gustafson S; Pittman A; Fanning R
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):190-9. PubMed ID: 23800818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evidence on the efficacy of insert earphone and sound field VRA with young infants.
    Day J; Bamford J; Parry G; Shepherd M; Quigley A
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 34(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 11201319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations.
    Meinke DK; Martin WH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):26. PubMed ID: 36732250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) for Sennheiser HDA 280 supra-aural audiometric earphones in the frequency range 125 Hz to 8000 Hz.
    Poulsen T; Oakley S
    Int J Audiol; 2009 May; 48(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 19842802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Beyer DT48 and etymotic insert earphones: auditory brain stem response measurements.
    Beauchaine KA; Kaminski JR; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):292-7. PubMed ID: 3678644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The equivalent threshold sound pressure levels and test-retest threshold variability of a consumer-grade insert earphone fitted with stock, foam, and otoacoustic emission probe ear tips.
    Seluakumaran K; Kamal Azizi A; Kulasegarah J
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jul; 63(7):551-559. PubMed ID: 37139683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reference threshold levels for an ER-3A insert earphone.
    Frank T; Vavrek MJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jan; 3(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 1571587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of earphone and sound field methods for estimating noise attenuation of foam earplugs.
    Carter NL; Upfold G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Jun; 54(6):307-12. PubMed ID: 8328360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Compensated active noise cancellation earphone for audiometric screening tests in noisy environments.
    Chang HY; Luo CH; Lo TS; Tai CC
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Nov; 58(11):747-753. PubMed ID: 31215819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of conductive hearing loss on the masking-level difference: insert versus standard earphones.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2652-7. PubMed ID: 8207138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sound attenuation of TDH-39 earphones in a diffuse field of narrow-band noise.
    Arlinger SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jan; 79(1):189-91. PubMed ID: 3944342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inter-aural attenuation with insert earphones.
    Munro KJ; Contractor A
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):799-801. PubMed ID: 20735285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone and Etymotic Research ER-2 insert earphone in the frequency range 125 Hz to 16 kHz.
    Han LA; Poulsen T
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 9638829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.