146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37672349)
1. Comparison of two optimization algorithms (VOLO
Thiele M; Galonske K; Ernst I
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 24(12):e14144. PubMed ID: 37672349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel inverse planning optimization algorithm for robotic radiosurgery: First clinical implementation and dosimetric evaluation.
Zeverino M; Marguet M; Zulliger C; Durham A; Jumeau R; Herrera F; Schiappacasse L; Bourhis J; Bochud FO; Moeckli R
Phys Med; 2019 Aug; 64():230-237. PubMed ID: 31515024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Largely reduced OAR doses, and planning and delivery times for challenging robotic SBRT cases, obtained with a novel optimizer.
Giżyńska MK; Rossi L; den Toom W; Milder MTW; de Vries KC; Nuyttens J; Heijmen BJM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):35-47. PubMed ID: 33475227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning of thoracic vertebral metastases using stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Mallory M; Pokhrel D; Badkul R; Jiang H; Lominska C; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):54-61. PubMed ID: 29349867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive dosimetric study on switching from a Type-B to a Type-C dose algorithm for modern lung SBRT.
Zhou C; Bennion N; Ma R; Liang X; Wang S; Zvolanek K; Hyun M; Li X; Zhou S; Zhen W; Lin C; Wahl A; Zheng D
Radiat Oncol; 2017 May; 12(1):80. PubMed ID: 28476138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric impact of different CT datasets for stereotactic treatment planning using 3D conformal radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Oechsner M; Odersky L; Berndt J; Combs SE; Wilkens JJ; Duma MN
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Dec; 10():249. PubMed ID: 26626865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance assessment of a new optimization system for robotic SBRT MLC-based plans.
Calusi S; Doro R; Di Cataldo V; Cipressi S; Francolini G; Bonucci I; Livi L; Masi L
Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():31-38. PubMed ID: 32088563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmarking techniques for stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage glottic laryngeal cancer: LINAC-based non-coplanar VMAT vs. Cyberknife planning.
Zhang Y; Chiu T; Dubas J; Tian Z; Lee P; Gu X; Yan Y; Sher D; Timmerman R; Zhao B
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Nov; 14(1):193. PubMed ID: 31684993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential reduction of lung dose via VMAT with jaw tracking in the treatment of single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT.
Pokhrel D; Sanford L; Halfman M; Molloy J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 May; 20(5):55-63. PubMed ID: 30955251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary lesions: comparison of different dose calculation algorithms for Oncentra MasterPlan®.
Troeller A; Garny S; Pachmann S; Kantz S; Gerum S; Manapov F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Söhn M
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Feb; 10():51. PubMed ID: 25888786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FFF-VMAT for SBRT of lung lesions: Improves dose coverage at tumor-lung interface compared to flattened beams.
Pokhrel D; Halfman M; Sanford L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 31859456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefit of dosimetry distribution for patients with multiple brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer by a Cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system.
Yu X; Wang Y; Yuan Z; Yu H; Song Y; Zhao L; Wang P
BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1144. PubMed ID: 33238967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between the HyperArc™ technique and the CyberKnife® technique for stereotactic treatment of brain metastases.
Guinement L; Salleron J; Buchheit I; Gérard K; Faivre JC; Royer P; Marchesi V
Cancer Radiother; 2023 Apr; 27(2):136-144. PubMed ID: 36797159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of liver exposure in CT-guided high-dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy versus SBRT in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Walter F; Nierer L; Rottler M; Duque AS; Weingandt H; Well J; Shpani R; Landry G; Seidensticker M; Streitparth F; Ricke J; Belka C; Corradini S
Radiat Oncol; 2021 May; 16(1):86. PubMed ID: 33957941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy.
Wei S; Lin H; Shi C; Xiong W; Chen CC; Huang S; Press RH; Hasan S; Chhabra AM; Choi JI; Simone CB; Kang M
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6560-6574. PubMed ID: 35929404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust Optimization of SBRT Planning for Patients With Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Shang H; Pu Y; Wang Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820916505. PubMed ID: 32314663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Zheng D; Zhang Q; Liang X; Zhu X; Verma V; Wang S; Zhou S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):48-58. PubMed ID: 27455476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
