132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37674327)
1. Bilateral salpingectomy as an option of permanent contraception at time of caesarean section: A survey of practice.
Noori N; Edwards L; Anpalagan A; Athavale R; Burling M; Herbst U; Brand A; Kapurubandara S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2024 Feb; 64(1):72-76. PubMed ID: 37674327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy during gynaecological surgery for benign disease: A survey of current Australian practice.
Kapurubandara S; Qin V; Gurram D; Anpalagan A; Merkur H; Hogg R; Brand A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Dec; 55(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 26768958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.
Ferrari F; Forte S; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Odicino F
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):373-376. PubMed ID: 30898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Barriers to salpingectomy for permanent contraception: A qualitative study with obstetricians and gynaecologists.
Obermair HM; Muir G; Gard GB
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Dec; 61(6):973-977. PubMed ID: 34554566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Permanent Sterilization after Failed Attempt at Bilateral Tubal Ligation at the Time of Previous Cesarean Section.
Hui M; Schwartzenburg C; Bhalwal A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1138-1139. PubMed ID: 35863610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal].
São Pedro V; Pires R; Santos F; Tovim Rodrigues C; Santos Silva I; Almeida MC; Águas F
Acta Med Port; 2021 Mar; 34(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 34214417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Salpingectomy versus Tubal Occlusion for Permanent Contraception during Cesarean Delivery: Outcomes and Physician Attitudes.
Levy D; Casey S; Zemtsov G; Whiteside JL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):860-864. PubMed ID: 32745622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Salpingectomie bilatérale aux fins de contraception permanente : série de cas et facteurs limitant le changement de pratique.
Ruel-Laliberté J; Binette A; Bertrand A
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Aug; 42(8):948-952. PubMed ID: 32345552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adoption of Complete Bilateral Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception at Time of Cesarean Delivery in Rhode Island.
DiSilvestro JB; Raker CA; Velasquez J; Mathews CA
R I Med J (2013); 2023 Jun; 106(5):49-53. PubMed ID: 37195163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.
Dilley SE; Havrilesky LJ; Bakkum-Gamez J; Cohn DE; Michael Straughn J; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Aug; 146(2):373-379. PubMed ID: 28577884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No. 344-Opportunistic Salpingectomy and Other Methods of Risk Reduction for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal Cancer in the General Population.
Salvador S; Scott S; Francis JA; Agrawal A; Giede C
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Jun; 39(6):480-493. PubMed ID: 28527613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective cohort study of tubal occlusion or salpingectomy for permanent contraception in Australia.
Baltus T; Brown J; Kapurubandara S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 62(2):312-318. PubMed ID: 34705269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits and Risks of Bilateral Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Delivery for Permanent Postpartum Contraception.
Luke S; Addae-Konadu K; Davidson B; Kuller J; Dotters-Katz S
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2022 Mar; 77(3):167-173. PubMed ID: 35275215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications after opportunistic salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation at cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.
Rufin KGA; do Valle HA; McAlpine JN; Elwood C; Hanley GE
Fertil Steril; 2024 Mar; 121(3):531-539. PubMed ID: 38043843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Subramaniam A; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29889762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial.
Piazza A; Schwirian K; Scott F; Wilson MD; Zite NB; Creinin MD
Contraception; 2019 Jan; 99(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 30266212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.
van Lieshout LAM; Steenbeek MP; De Hullu JA; Vos MC; Houterman S; Wilkinson J; Piek JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Aug; 8(8):CD012858. PubMed ID: 31456223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.
Lehn K; Gu L; Creinin MD; Chen MJ
Contraception; 2018 Sep; 98(3):232-236. PubMed ID: 29935148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
