These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37674327)

  • 1. Bilateral salpingectomy as an option of permanent contraception at time of caesarean section: A survey of practice.
    Noori N; Edwards L; Anpalagan A; Athavale R; Burling M; Herbst U; Brand A; Kapurubandara S
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2024 Feb; 64(1):72-76. PubMed ID: 37674327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy during gynaecological surgery for benign disease: A survey of current Australian practice.
    Kapurubandara S; Qin V; Gurram D; Anpalagan A; Merkur H; Hogg R; Brand A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Dec; 55(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 26768958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
    Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.
    Ferrari F; Forte S; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Odicino F
    Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):373-376. PubMed ID: 30898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Barriers to salpingectomy for permanent contraception: A qualitative study with obstetricians and gynaecologists.
    Obermair HM; Muir G; Gard GB
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Dec; 61(6):973-977. PubMed ID: 34554566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Permanent Sterilization after Failed Attempt at Bilateral Tubal Ligation at the Time of Previous Cesarean Section.
    Hui M; Schwartzenburg C; Bhalwal A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1138-1139. PubMed ID: 35863610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal].
    São Pedro V; Pires R; Santos F; Tovim Rodrigues C; Santos Silva I; Almeida MC; Águas F
    Acta Med Port; 2021 Mar; 34(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 34214417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Salpingectomy versus Tubal Occlusion for Permanent Contraception during Cesarean Delivery: Outcomes and Physician Attitudes.
    Levy D; Casey S; Zemtsov G; Whiteside JL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):860-864. PubMed ID: 32745622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Salpingectomie bilatérale aux fins de contraception permanente : série de cas et facteurs limitant le changement de pratique.
    Ruel-Laliberté J; Binette A; Bertrand A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Aug; 42(8):948-952. PubMed ID: 32345552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adoption of Complete Bilateral Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception at Time of Cesarean Delivery in Rhode Island.
    DiSilvestro JB; Raker CA; Velasquez J; Mathews CA
    R I Med J (2013); 2023 Jun; 106(5):49-53. PubMed ID: 37195163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.
    Dilley SE; Havrilesky LJ; Bakkum-Gamez J; Cohn DE; Michael Straughn J; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Aug; 146(2):373-379. PubMed ID: 28577884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No. 344-Opportunistic Salpingectomy and Other Methods of Risk Reduction for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal Cancer in the General Population.
    Salvador S; Scott S; Francis JA; Agrawal A; Giede C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Jun; 39(6):480-493. PubMed ID: 28527613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A retrospective cohort study of tubal occlusion or salpingectomy for permanent contraception in Australia.
    Baltus T; Brown J; Kapurubandara S
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 62(2):312-318. PubMed ID: 34705269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits and Risks of Bilateral Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Delivery for Permanent Postpartum Contraception.
    Luke S; Addae-Konadu K; Davidson B; Kuller J; Dotters-Katz S
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2022 Mar; 77(3):167-173. PubMed ID: 35275215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications after opportunistic salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation at cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.
    Rufin KGA; do Valle HA; McAlpine JN; Elwood C; Hanley GE
    Fertil Steril; 2024 Mar; 121(3):531-539. PubMed ID: 38043843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Subramaniam A; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29889762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial.
    Piazza A; Schwirian K; Scott F; Wilson MD; Zite NB; Creinin MD
    Contraception; 2019 Jan; 99(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 30266212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
    Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.
    Lehn K; Gu L; Creinin MD; Chen MJ
    Contraception; 2018 Sep; 98(3):232-236. PubMed ID: 29935148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.
    van Lieshout LAM; Steenbeek MP; De Hullu JA; Vos MC; Houterman S; Wilkinson J; Piek JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Aug; 8(8):CD012858. PubMed ID: 31456223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.