BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37675732)

  • 21. Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?
    Brown G; Davies S; Williams GT; Bourne MW; Newcombe RG; Radcliffe AG; Blethyn J; Dallimore NS; Rees BI; Phillips CJ; Maughan TS
    Br J Cancer; 2004 Jul; 91(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15188013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer.
    Sanchez-Chapado M; Angulo JC; Ibarburen C; Aguado F; Ruiz A; Viaño J; García-Segura JM; Gonzalez-Esteban J; Rodriquez-Vallejo JM
    Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 9286643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Value of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Improving the Detection of Anterior Prostate Cancer.
    Zugor V; Kühn R; Engelhard K; Poth S; Bernat MM; Porres D; Labanaris AP
    Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4279-83. PubMed ID: 27466544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA.
    Brikun I; Nusskern D; Decatus A; Harvey E; Li L; Freije D
    Clin Epigenetics; 2018; 10():91. PubMed ID: 29988684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Accuracy of endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative local staging of prostate cancer].
    Baccos A; Schiavina R; Zukerman Z; Busato F; Gaudiano C; Salizzoni E; Fiorentino M; Golfieri R; Martorana G
    Urologia; 2012; 79(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 22522463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The prognostic value of digital rectal exam for the existence of advanced pathologic features after prostatectomy.
    Prebay ZJ; Medairos R; Doolittle J; Langenstroer P; Jacobsohn K; See WA; Johnson SC
    Prostate; 2021 Oct; 81(14):1064-1070. PubMed ID: 34297858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Role of Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Its Correlation with the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Volume.
    Morote J; Picola N; Muñoz-Rodriguez J; Paesano N; Ruiz-Plazas X; Muñoz-Rivero MV; Celma A; García-de Manuel G; Miró B; Abascal JM; Servian P
    World J Mens Health; 2024 Apr; 42(2):441-448. PubMed ID: 38164025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Could Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help to Identify the Presence of Prostate Cancer Before Initial Biopsy? The Development of Nomogram Predicting the Outcomes of Prostate Biopsy in the Chinese Population.
    Fang D; Zhao C; Ren D; Yu W; Wang R; Wang H; Li X; Yin W; Yu X; Yang K; Liu P; Shan G; Li S; He Q; Wang X; Xin Z; Zhou L
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(13):4284-4292. PubMed ID: 27464612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume.
    Chiu PK; Roobol MJ; Teoh JY; Lee WM; Yip SY; Hou SM; Bangma CH; Ng CF
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1631-7. PubMed ID: 27349564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma.
    Lim C; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Shabana WM; Quon JS; El-Khodary M; Thornhill RE; El Hallani S; Schieda N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):726-36. PubMed ID: 26303719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Diagnostic value of 3.0-tesla high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for invasion depth of rectal cancer].
    Yao X; Song X; Wang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):668-74. PubMed ID: 27353102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy.
    Huang C; Song G; Wang H; Ji G; Li J; Chen Y; Fan Y; Fang D; Xiong G; Xin Z; Zhou L
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():6368309. PubMed ID: 30276213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
    Chan BPH; Patel R; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L; Yaghoobi M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Aug; 90(2):196-203.e1. PubMed ID: 31004599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of post biopsy digital rectal compression on improving prostate cancer staging using magnetic resonance imaging in localized prostate cancer.
    Park KK; Chung MS; Chung SY; Kim JH; Chung BH
    Yonsei Med J; 2013 Jan; 54(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 23225802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Establishment and prospective validation of an SUV
    Jiao J; Kang F; Zhang J; Quan Z; Wen W; Zhao X; Ma S; Wu P; Yang F; Guo W; Yang X; Yuan J; Shi Y; Wang J; Qin W
    Theranostics; 2021; 11(17):8396-8411. PubMed ID: 34373749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differentially expressed glycoproteins in pre- and post-digital rectal examination urine samples for detecting aggressive prostate cancer.
    Wang Y; Lih TM; Höti N; Sokoll LJ; Chesnut G; Petrovics G; Kohaar I; Zhang H
    Proteomics; 2023 Apr; 23(7-8):e2200023. PubMed ID: 36479985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early detection of high-grade prostate cancer using digital rectal examination (DRE) in men with a prostate-specific antigen level of <2.5 ng/mL and the risk of death.
    Hattangadi JA; Chen MH; D'Amico AV
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1636-41. PubMed ID: 22757982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationship of ultrasound staging and bilateral biopsy positivity to outcome in stage T1c prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy.
    Liebross RH; Pollack A; Lankford SP; von Eschenbach AC; Zagars GK
    Urology; 1998 Oct; 52(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 9763087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.