183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37675805)
21. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospective quality of life in men choosing open vs. robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term results from a racially diverse multi-institutional database.
Kord E; Jung N; Boehm B; Conti G; Kuo HC; Frankel J; Flores J; Levie K; Ho O; Elsamanoudi S; Jiang J; Stroup SP; Musser J; Ernest A; Speir R; Chesnut G; Tausch TJ; Porter C
World J Urol; 2022 Jun; 40(6):1427-1436. PubMed ID: 35279731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in a matched-pair analysis.
Martinschek A; Heinzelmann K; Ritter M; Heinrich E; Trojan L
J Endourol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 22489895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nongenitourinary complications associated with robot-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy: A single institution assessment of 1,100 patients over 11 years.
Brooks NA; Boland RS; Strigenz ME; Mott SL; Brown JA
Urol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):501.e9-501.e13. PubMed ID: 30153970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.
Coughlin GD; Yaxley JW; Chambers SK; Occhipinti S; Samaratunga H; Zajdlewicz L; Teloken P; Dunglison N; Williams S; Lavin MF; Gardiner RA
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 30017351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience.
de Oliveira RAR; Guimarães GC; Mourão TC; de Lima Favaretto R; Santana TBM; Lopes A; de Cassio Zequi S
J Robot Surg; 2021 Dec; 15(6):859-868. PubMed ID: 33417155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients.
Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and various radical prostatectomy techniques: is pelvic drainage necessary?
Danuser H; Di Pierro GB; Stucki P; Mattei A
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):963-9. PubMed ID: 23356829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Multidimensional Analysis of Prostate Surgery Costs in the United States: Robotic-Assisted versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy.
Bijlani A; Hebert AE; Davitian M; May H; Speers M; Leung R; Mohamed NE; Sacks HS; Tewari A
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):391-403. PubMed ID: 27325331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer.
Yun Z; Li X; Zhu D; Li L; Jiang S
Int Wound J; 2024 Apr; 21(4):e14535. PubMed ID: 38169097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.
Park J; Yoo DS; Song C; Park S; Park S; Kim SC; Cho Y; Ahn H
World J Urol; 2014 Feb; 32(1):193-9. PubMed ID: 24062092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Bruendl J; Drerup M; Herrmann J; Isbarn H; Beyer B;
World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):855-861. PubMed ID: 29427005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample.
Kowalczyk KJ; Levy JM; Caplan CF; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Gu X; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):803-9. PubMed ID: 22209053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Wound complications frequency in heart transplant recipients on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors: A meta-analysis.
Zhu S; Yu W; Gao J; Xiong J
Int Wound J; 2023 Nov; 20(9):3491-3497. PubMed ID: 37165731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy induces lower tissue trauma than radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Quinto D; Reis ST; Zampolli LJ; Pimenta R; Guimarães VR; Viana NI; Dos Santos GA; Gimenez MP; Leite KR; Zampolli H; da Cruz JAS; Srougi M; Passerotti CC
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):147-151. PubMed ID: 33009987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The outcome of sutured wounds compared with tissue adhesive for paediatric wound closure: A meta-analysis.
Cui X; Zhang Y; Wang N; Chen Y; Xu J; Hou J
Int Wound J; 2023 Oct; 20(8):3298-3306. PubMed ID: 37221969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study.
Plym A; Chiesa F; Voss M; Holmberg L; Johansson E; Stattin P; Lambe M
Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 26782345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial.
Nyberg M; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Sjoberg D; Wilderäng U; Carlsson SV; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Steineck G; Haglind E; Bjartell A;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):353-360. PubMed ID: 31158073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
