These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Generalization of fewest-switches surface hopping for coherences. Tempelaar R; Reichman DR J Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 148(10):102309. PubMed ID: 29544318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonadiabatic surface hopping Herman-Kluk semiclassical initial value representation method revisited: applications to Tully's three model systems. Wu Y; Herman MF J Chem Phys; 2005 Oct; 123(14):144106. PubMed ID: 16238373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unified Formulation of Phase Space Mapping Approaches for Nonadiabatic Quantum Dynamics. Liu J; He X; Wu B Acc Chem Res; 2021 Dec; 54(23):4215-4228. PubMed ID: 34756027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonadiabatic Dynamics with Exact Factorization: Implementation and Assessment. Han D; Akimov AV J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Jun; 20(12):5022-5042. PubMed ID: 38837952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmarking Quasiclassical Mapping Hamiltonian Methods for Simulating Electronically Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics. Gao X; Saller MAC; Liu Y; Kelly A; Richardson JO; Geva E J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 May; 16(5):2883-2895. PubMed ID: 32227993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classical and nonclassical effects in surface hopping methodology for simulating coupled electronic-nuclear dynamics. Martens CC Faraday Discuss; 2019 Dec; 221():449-477. PubMed ID: 31573020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Branching and phase corrected surface hopping: A benchmark of nonadiabatic dynamics in multilevel systems. Shao C; Xu J; Wang L J Chem Phys; 2021 Jun; 154(23):234109. PubMed ID: 34241240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Appraisal of Surface Hopping as a Tool for Modeling Condensed Phase Linear Absorption Spectra. Petit AS; Subotnik JE J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Sep; 11(9):4328-41. PubMed ID: 26575927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A mapping approach to surface hopping. Mannouch JR; Richardson JO J Chem Phys; 2023 Mar; 158(10):104111. PubMed ID: 36922129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exciton dynamics from the mapping approach to surface hopping: comparison with Förster and Redfield theories. Runeson JE; Fay TP; Manolopoulos DE Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Feb; 26(6):4929-4938. PubMed ID: 38265093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fewest-switches surface hopping and decoherence in multiple dimensions. Subotnik JE J Phys Chem A; 2011 Nov; 115(44):12083-96. PubMed ID: 21995423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonadiabatic dynamics with quantum nuclei: simulating charge transfer with ring polymer surface hopping. Ghosh S; Giannini S; Lively K; Blumberger J Faraday Discuss; 2019 Dec; 221(0):501-525. PubMed ID: 31538635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coherent switching with decay of mixing: an improved treatment of electronic coherence for non-Born-Oppenheimer trajectories. Zhu C; Nangia S; Jasper AW; Truhlar DG J Chem Phys; 2004 Oct; 121(16):7658-70. PubMed ID: 15485225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A size-consistent multi-state mapping approach to surface hopping. Lawrence JE; Mannouch JR; Richardson JO J Chem Phys; 2024 Jun; 160(24):. PubMed ID: 38940540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An efficient decoherence scheme for fewest switches surface hopping method. Sindhu A; Jain A J Chem Phys; 2023 Apr; 158(15):. PubMed ID: 37094009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient and accurate surface hopping for long time nonadiabatic quantum dynamics. Kelly A; Markland TE J Chem Phys; 2013 Jul; 139(1):014104. PubMed ID: 23822290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A first principles derivation of energy-conserving momentum jumps in surface hopping simulations. Huang DM; Green AT; Martens CC J Chem Phys; 2023 Dec; 159(21):. PubMed ID: 38047505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]