BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37676398)

  • 1. An updated algorithm for an effective choice of continuous glucose monitoring for people with insulin-treated diabetes.
    Maiorino MI; Buzzetti R; Irace C; Laviola L; Napoli N; Pitocco D; Esposito K;
    Endocrine; 2023 Nov; 82(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 37676398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Baseline User Characteristics on the Benefits of Real-Time Versus Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Moderator Analyses of the ALERTT1 Trial.
    Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 May; 18(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 36172693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lower Glycated Hemoglobin with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than with Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring After 1 Year: The CORRIDA LIFE Study.
    Radovnická L; Hásková A; Do QD; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Mikeš O; Cihlář D; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Prázný M; Šoupal J
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2022 Dec; 24(12):859-867. PubMed ID: 36037056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of flash glucose monitoring with real time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
    Massa GG; Gys I; Bevilacqua E; Wijnands A; Zeevaert R
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 152():111-118. PubMed ID: 31121275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing real-time and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes (ALERTT1): a 6-month, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
    Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
    Lancet; 2021 Jun; 397(10291):2275-2283. PubMed ID: 34089660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jancev M; Vissers TACM; Visseren FLJ; van Bon AC; Serné EH; DeVries JH; de Valk HW; van Sloten TT
    Diabetologia; 2024 May; 67(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 38363342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hásková A; Radovnická L; Petruželková L; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Kádě O; Matoulek M; Prázný M; Šoupal J
    Diabetes Care; 2020 Nov; 43(11):2744-2750. PubMed ID: 32859607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Glycemic Metrics Measured Simultaneously by Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Nørgaard SK; Mathiesen ER; Nørgaard K; Ringholm L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2021 Oct; 23(10):665-672. PubMed ID: 34086494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are nocturnal hypoglycemia prevention strategies influenced by diabetes technology usage? A BETTER registry analysis.
    Talbo MK; Rabasa-Lhoret R; Yale JF; Peters TM; Brazeau AS
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2022 Sep; 191():110080. PubMed ID: 36099973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time In Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Using Treatment Strategies Based on Nonautomated Insulin Delivery Systems in the Real World.
    Cherubini V; Bonfanti R; Casertano A; De Nitto E; Iannilli A; Lombardo F; Maltoni G; Marigliano M; Bassi M; Minuto N; Mozzillo E; Rabbone I; Rapini N; Rigamonti A; Salzano G; Scaramuzza A; Schiaffini R; Tinti D; Toni S; Zagaroli L; Zucchini S; Maffeis C; Gesuita R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Jul; 22(7):509-515. PubMed ID: 32073311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of factors associated with improved glycemic control after switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes.
    Yamada E; Nakajima Y; Horiguchi K; Okada S; Yamada M
    Endocr J; 2023 Dec; 70(12):1187-1193. PubMed ID: 37766568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association Between Adherence, A1C Improvement, and Type of Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in People with Type 1 Diabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Intensive Insulin Therapy.
    Nemlekar PM; Hannah KL; Green CR; Norman GJ
    Diabetes Ther; 2024 Mar; 15(3):639-648. PubMed ID: 38289464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of Personal Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device Is Associated With Reduced Risk of Hypoglycemia in a 16-Week Clinical Trial of People With Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion.
    Jensen MH; Vestergaard P; Hirsch IB; Hejlesen O
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 16(1):106-112. PubMed ID: 32945187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-world glycaemic outcomes in adult persons with type 1 diabetes using a real-time continuous glucose monitor compared to an intermittently scanned glucose monitor: A retrospective observational study from the Canadian LMC diabetes registry (REAL-CGM-T1D).
    Brown RE; Chu L; Norman GJ; Abitbol A
    Diabet Med; 2022 Nov; 39(11):e14937. PubMed ID: 36065977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Prevention of Recurrent Severe Hypoglycemia.
    Davis TME; Dwyer P; England M; Fegan PG; Davis WA
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 May; 22(5):367-373. PubMed ID: 31724878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.
    Avari P; Moscardo V; Jugnee N; Oliver N; Reddy M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):567-574. PubMed ID: 31375042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuous Glucose Monitor Use Prevents Glycemic Deterioration in Insulin-Treated Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
    Karter AJ; Parker MM; Moffet HH; Gilliam LK; Dlott R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2022 May; 24(5):332-337. PubMed ID: 35104159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of Individuals With Diabetes at High Risk for Hypoglycemia: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.
    McCall AL; Lieb DC; Gianchandani R; MacMaster H; Maynard GA; Murad MH; Seaquist E; Wolfsdorf JI; Wright RF; Wiercioch W
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2023 Feb; 108(3):529-562. PubMed ID: 36477488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventional Evidence.
    Seidu S; Kunutsor SK; Ajjan RA; Choudhary P
    Diabetes Care; 2024 Jan; 47(1):169-179. PubMed ID: 38117991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Treated with an Intensive Insulin Regimen: 1-Year Real-Life Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Al Hayek AA; Al Dawish MA
    Adv Ther; 2023 Jun; 40(6):2855-2868. PubMed ID: 37133646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.