These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37676441)

  • 1. Differences in decisions affected by cognitive biases: examining human values, need for cognition, and numeracy.
    Kakinohana RK; Pilati R
    Psicol Reflex Crit; 2023 Sep; 36(1):26. PubMed ID: 37676441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The moderating role of objective and subjective numeracy in attribute framing.
    Gamliel E; Kreiner H; Garcia-Retamero R
    Int J Psychol; 2016 Apr; 51(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 25640471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.
    Stanovich KE; West RF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):672-95. PubMed ID: 18361678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is clinical decision making in stepped-care psychological services influenced by heuristics and biases?
    Michael B; Kellett S; Delgadillo J
    Behav Cogn Psychother; 2023 Jul; 51(4):362-373. PubMed ID: 37185218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the Presence of Cognitive Biases in Health Care Decision Making: A Survey of U.S. Formulary Decision Makers.
    Mezzio DJ; Nguyen VB; Kiselica A; O'Day K
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Nov; 24(11):1173-1183. PubMed ID: 30362919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy.
    Blumenthal-Barby JS; Krieger H
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):539-57. PubMed ID: 25145577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heuristics and biases: interactions among numeracy, ability, and reflectiveness predict normative responding.
    Klaczynski PA
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():665. PubMed ID: 25071639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of personality, authoritarianism and cognition in the United Kingdom's 2016 referendum on European Union membership.
    Sumner C; Scofield JE; Buchanan EM; Evans MR; Shearing M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1077354. PubMed ID: 37034948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual Differences in Numeracy and Cognitive Reflection, with Implications for Biases and Fallacies in Probability Judgment.
    Liberali JM; Reyna VF; Furlan S; Stein LM; Pardo ST
    J Behav Decis Mak; 2012 Oct; 25(4):361-381. PubMed ID: 23878413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moderating Role of Information Asymmetry Between Cognitive Biases and Investment Decisions: A Mediating Effect of Risk Perception.
    Zhang M; Nazir MS; Farooqi R; Ishfaq M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():828956. PubMed ID: 35391971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.
    Saposnik G; Redelmeier D; Ruff CC; Tobler PN
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Nov; 16(1):138. PubMed ID: 27809908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive and implicit biases in nurses' judgment and decision-making: A scoping review.
    Thirsk LM; Panchuk JT; Stahlke S; Hagtvedt R
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2022 Sep; 133():104284. PubMed ID: 35696809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive Abilities, Monitoring Confidence, and Control Thresholds Explain Individual Differences in Heuristics and Biases.
    Jackson SA; Kleitman S; Howie P; Stankov L
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1559. PubMed ID: 27790170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influential Cognitive Processes on Framing Biases in Aging.
    Perez AM; Spence JS; Kiel LD; Venza EE; Chapman SB
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():661. PubMed ID: 29867641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision making biases in the allied health professions: A systematic scoping review.
    Featherston R; Downie LE; Vogel AP; Galvin KL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240716. PubMed ID: 33079949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions.
    Luz PM; Nadanovsky P; Leask J
    Cad Saude Publica; 2020; 36Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e00136620. PubMed ID: 33237198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive Biases in Orthopaedic Surgery.
    Janssen SJ; Teunis T; Ring D; Parisien RC
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2021 Jul; 29(14):624-633. PubMed ID: 34234094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive Biases Influence Decision-Making Regarding Postacute Care in a Skilled Nursing Facility.
    Burke RE; Leonard C; Lee M; Ayele R; Cumbler E; Allyn R; Greysen SR
    J Hosp Med; 2020 Jan; 15(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 31433771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of biases in numerical magnitude allocation on human prosocial decision making.
    Arshad Q; Nigmatullina Y; Siddiqui S; Franka M; Mediratta S; Ramachandaran S; Lobo R; Malhotra PA; Roberts RE; Bronstein AM
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Dec; 118(6):3007-3013. PubMed ID: 28904100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.