137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37676906)
1. A spot-specific range uncertainty framework for robust optimization of proton therapy treatments.
Cohilis M; Souris K; Buti G; Chang CW; Lin L; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6554-6568. PubMed ID: 37676906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190573. PubMed ID: 31778315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Bai X; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025004. PubMed ID: 30523932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Gu W; Neph R; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3356-3370. PubMed ID: 31169917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.
Liu C; Schild SE; Chang JY; Liao Z; Korte S; Shen J; Ding X; Hu Y; Kang Y; Keole SR; Sio TT; Wong WW; Sahoo N; Bues M; Liu W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jun; 101(2):479-489. PubMed ID: 29550033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13512. PubMed ID: 34989458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the effect of setup uncertainty reduction and adaptation to geometric changes on normal tissue complication probability using online adaptive head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy.
Lalonde A; Bobić M; Sharp GC; Chamseddine I; Winey B; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2023 May; 68(11):. PubMed ID: 37164020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Including anatomical variations in robust optimization for head and neck proton therapy can reduce the need of adaptation.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Feb; 131():127-134. PubMed ID: 30773179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Robustness to Setup and Range Uncertainties for Head and Neck Patients Treated With Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
Malyapa R; Lowe M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Weber DC; Albertini F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):154-162. PubMed ID: 27084638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
Quan EM; Liu W; Wu R; Li Y; Frank SJ; Zhang X; Zhu XR; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709. PubMed ID: 23927306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
