These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37678730)

  • 1. From oocytes to a live birth: Are we improving the biological efficiency?
    Sabbagh R; Mulligan S; Shah J; Korkidakis A; Penzias A; Vaughan D; Patrizio P; Sakkas D
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Dec; 120(6):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 37678730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is associated with reduced live birth rates in fresh but not frozen donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 18,562 donor cycles reported to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.
    Gingold JA; Kucherov A; Wu H; Fazzari M; Lieman H; Ball GD; Doody K; Jindal S
    Fertil Steril; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39128672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of pregnancy outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and conventional in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a stratified examination on the basis of the quantity of oocytes and blastocysts from a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Hu M; Liu M; Tian S; Guo L; Zang Z; Chen ZJ; Li Y
    Fertil Steril; 2024 Jul; 122(1):121-130. PubMed ID: 38367687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on live birth rate in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System study.
    Gerber RS; Fazzari M; Kappy M; Cohen A; Galperin S; Lieman H; Jindal S; Buyuk E
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 33012553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.
    Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Soscia D; Giancani A; Scepi E; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):929-940. PubMed ID: 33608730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the efficacy and beneficial population of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy start from the oocyte retrieval cycle: a real-world study.
    Ma S; Liao J; Zhang S; Yang X; Hocher B; Tan J; Tan Y; Hu L; Gong F; Xie P; Lin G
    J Transl Med; 2023 Nov; 21(1):779. PubMed ID: 37919732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation.
    Cornelisse S; Zagers M; Kostova E; Fleischer K; van Wely M; Mastenbroek S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Sep; 9(9):CD005291. PubMed ID: 32898291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. To test or not to test? A framework for counselling patients on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).
    Murphy LA; Seidler EA; Vaughan DA; Resetkova N; Penzias AS; Toth TL; Thornton KL; Sakkas D
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 34(2):268-275. PubMed ID: 30500907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planned oocyte cryopreservation-10-15-year follow-up: return rates and cycle outcomes.
    Blakemore JK; Grifo JA; DeVore SM; Hodes-Wertz B; Berkeley AS
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1511-1520. PubMed ID: 33712289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes.
    Doyle N; Gainty M; Eubanks A; Doyle J; Hayes H; Tucker M; Devine K; DeCherney A; Levy M; Jahandideh S; Hill M
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2548-2555. PubMed ID: 33057600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction in multiple pregnancy rate in donor oocyte-recipient gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA with single-embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing.
    Makhijani R; Coulter M; Taggar A; Godiwala P; O'Sullivan D; Nulsen J; Engmann L; Benadiva C; Grow D
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Jun; 38(6):1441-1447. PubMed ID: 33709344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients with partial X monosomy using their own oocytes: is this a suitable indication?
    Giles J; Meseguer M; Mercader A; Rubio C; Alegre L; Vidal C; Trabalon M; Bosch E
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Aug; 114(2):346-353. PubMed ID: 32680612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using a matched propensity score design.
    Haviland MJ; Murphy LA; Modest AM; Fox MP; Wise LA; Nillni YI; Sakkas D; Hacker MR
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 32856053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproductive genetics laboratory may impact euploid blastocyst and live birth rates: a comparison of 4 national laboratories' PGT-A results from vitrified donor oocytes.
    Bardos J; Kwal J; Caswell W; Jahandideh S; Stratton M; Tucker M; DeCherney A; Devine K; Hill M; O'Brien JE
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Jan; 119(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 36460523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of IVF live birth outcomes with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data collection 2016-2018.
    Sanders KD; Silvestri G; Gordon T; Griffin DK
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Dec; 38(12):3277-3285. PubMed ID: 34766235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oocyte or embryo number needed to optimize live birth and cumulative live birth rates in mild stimulation IVF cycles.
    Datta AK; Campbell S; Felix N; Singh JSH; Nargund G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Aug; 43(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 34140227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.
    Roeca C; Johnson R; Carlson N; Polotsky AJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Sep; 37(9):2283-2292. PubMed ID: 32617730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting live birth rates in donor oocytes from commercial egg banks vs. program egg donors: an analysis of 40,485 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry in 2016-2018.
    Williams RS; Ellis DD; Wilkinson EA; Kramer JM; Datta S; Guzick DS
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34802685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced live-birth rates after IVF/ICSI in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: results of a multicentre cohort study.
    Lind T; Holte J; Olofsson JI; Hadziosmanovic N; Gudmundsson J; Nedstrand E; Lood M; Berglund L; Rodriguez-Wallberg K
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):238-247. PubMed ID: 29211889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.