202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37679532)
1. Assessing the accuracy of ChatGPT references in head and neck and ENT disciplines.
Frosolini A; Franz L; Benedetti S; Vaira LA; de Filippis C; Gennaro P; Marioni G; Gabriele G
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Nov; 280(11):5129-5133. PubMed ID: 37679532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and -4 in providing scientific references in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.
Lechien JR; Briganti G; Vaira LA
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Apr; 281(4):2159-2165. PubMed ID: 38206389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Large Language Model Performance and Reliability for Citations and References in Scholarly Writing: Cross-Disciplinary Study.
Mugaanyi J; Cai L; Cheng S; Lu C; Huang J
J Med Internet Res; 2024 Apr; 26():e52935. PubMed ID: 38578685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is ChatGPT accurate and reliable in answering questions regarding head and neck cancer?
Kuşcu O; Pamuk AE; Sütay Süslü N; Hosal S
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1256459. PubMed ID: 38107064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ChatGPT vs UpToDate: comparative study of usefulness and reliability of Chatbot in common clinical presentations of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery.
Karimov Z; Allahverdiyev I; Agayarov OY; Demir D; Almuradova E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Apr; 281(4):2145-2151. PubMed ID: 38217726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the landscape of AI-assisted decision-making in head and neck cancer treatment: a comparative analysis of NCCN guidelines and ChatGPT responses.
Marchi F; Bellini E; Iandelli A; Sampieri C; Peretti G
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Apr; 281(4):2123-2136. PubMed ID: 38421392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References.
Athaluri SA; Manthena SV; Kesapragada VSRKM; Yarlagadda V; Dave T; Duddumpudi RTS
Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37432. PubMed ID: 37182055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ChatGPT in head and neck scientific writing: A precautionary anecdote.
Wu RT; Dang RR
Am J Otolaryngol; 2023; 44(6):103980. PubMed ID: 37459740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilizing artificial intelligence in academic writing: an in-depth evaluation of a scientific review on fertility preservation written by ChatGPT-4.
Safrai M; Orwig KE
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38619763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened.
Májovský M; Černý M; Kasal M; Komarc M; Netuka D
J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e46924. PubMed ID: 37256685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Navigating the Landscape of Personalized Medicine: The Relevance of ChatGPT, BingChat, and Bard AI in Nephrology Literature Searches.
Aiumtrakul N; Thongprayoon C; Suppadungsuk S; Krisanapan P; Miao J; Qureshi F; Cheungpasitporn W
J Pers Med; 2023 Sep; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37888068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How much can we rely on artificial intelligence chatbots such as the ChatGPT software program to assist with scientific writing?
Dashti M; Londono J; Ghasemi S; Moghaddasi N
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37438164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of ChatGPT-Generated Information on Head and Neck and Oromaxillofacial Surgery: A Multicenter Collaborative Analysis.
Vaira LA; Lechien JR; Abbate V; Allevi F; Audino G; Beltramini GA; Bergonzani M; Bolzoni A; Committeri U; Crimi S; Gabriele G; Lonardi F; Maglitto F; Petrocelli M; Pucci R; Saponaro G; Tel A; Vellone V; Chiesa-Estomba CM; Boscolo-Rizzo P; Salzano G; De Riu G
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jun; 170(6):1492-1503. PubMed ID: 37595113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Writing Scientific Review Articles.
Kacena MA; Plotkin LI; Fehrenbacher JC
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2024 Feb; 22(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 38227177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ChatGPT and artificial hallucinations in stem cell research: assessing the accuracy of generated references - a preliminary study.
Sharun K; Banu SA; Pawde AM; Kumar R; Akash S; Dhama K; Pal A
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2023 Oct; 85(10):5275-5278. PubMed ID: 37811040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the Limits of Artificial Intelligence for Referencing Scientific Articles.
Graf EM; McKinney JA; Dye AB; Lin L; Sanchez-Ramos L
Am J Perinatol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38653452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strengths and Weaknesses of ChatGPT Models for Scientific Writing About Medical Vitamin B12: Mixed Methods Study.
Abuyaman O
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e49459. PubMed ID: 37948100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of ChatGPT generated diagnosis from patient's medical history and imaging findings in neuroradiology cases.
Horiuchi D; Tatekawa H; Shimono T; Walston SL; Takita H; Matsushita S; Oura T; Mitsuyama Y; Miki Y; Ueda D
Neuroradiology; 2024 Jan; 66(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 37994939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT's potential to assist academic writing.
Semrl N; Feigl S; Taumberger N; Bracic T; Fluhr H; Blockeel C; Kollmann M
Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2281-2288. PubMed ID: 37833847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?
Altmäe S; Sola-Leyva A; Salumets A
Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Jul; 47(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 37142479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
