These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37681471)

  • 1. Virtual implant scan body switch by using computer-aided design programs avoiding the need of obtaining a new intraoral implant digital scan: A novel protocol.
    Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; García-Sala Bonmatí F; de Fernández Estevan L; Guinot Barona C; Maneiro Lojo J; Revilla-León M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 36(2):278-283. PubMed ID: 37681471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A guide for selecting the intraoral scan extension when fabricating tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Kois JC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jan; 36(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 37789708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraoral Digital Scans for Fabricating Tooth-Supported Prostheses Using a Custom Intraoral Scan Body.
    Gómez-Polo M; Revilla-León M; Limones Á; Cascos R; Gómez-Polo C; Ortega R
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 34894032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Additively manufactured devices with varying designs and sizes for acquiring initial intraoral implant scans.
    Guirao S; Llansana F; Button H; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):181-185. PubMed ID: 37585338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.
    Dohiem MM; Abdelaziz MS; Abdalla MF; Fawzy AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):486. PubMed ID: 36371189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the implant scan body bevel location, implant angulation and position on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study.
    Gómez-Polo M; Álvarez F; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104122. PubMed ID: 35395345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of scan body design on accuracy of the implant position as transferred to a virtual definitive implant cast.
    Revilla-León M; Smith Z; Methani MM; Zandinejad A; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):918-923. PubMed ID: 32493568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE
    Mangano F; Margiani B; Admakin O
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of implant angulation and clinical implant scan body height on the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans.
    Gómez-Polo M; Sallorenzo A; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Barmak AB; Att W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 35337658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Tohme H; Lawand G; Chmielewska M; Makhzoume J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):354-362. PubMed ID: 34112521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle.
    Nagata K; Fuchigami K; Okuhama Y; Wakamori K; Tsuruoka H; Nakashizu T; Hoshi N; Atsumi M; Kimoto K; Kawana H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):464. PubMed ID: 34556111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study.
    Motel C; Kirchner E; Adler W; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):309-314. PubMed ID: 31802574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Altered reverse impression method involving extraoral digitalization of a verification jig for the fabrication of implant-supported prosthesis by using a complete-digital workflow.
    Rosmaninho A; Vedovato E; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):566-572. PubMed ID: 37882153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An additively manufactured intraoral scan body for aiding complete-arch intraoral implant digital scans with guided integration of 3D virtual representation.
    Pérez-Giugovaz MG; Mosier M; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 33413985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Clinical Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Dental Implant Impressions.
    Rutkunas V; Gedrimiene A; Adaskevicius R; Al-Haj Husain N; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2020 Nov; 28(4):173-181. PubMed ID: 32673469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characteristics of intraoral scan bodies and their influence on impression accuracy: A systematic review.
    Pachiou A; Zervou E; Tsirogiannis P; Sykaras N; Tortopidis D; Kourtis S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 37381677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital implant impression taking - an overview].
    Mahl D; Glenz F; Marinello CP
    Swiss Dent J; 2014; 124(2):165-86. PubMed ID: 24585419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital Workflow for Double Complete Arch Zirconia Prostheses Utilizing a Novel Scan Body.
    Marinis A; Papaspyridakos P; Sicilia E; Bernandes SR; Touloumi F; Chochlidakis K; Weber HP
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 34453373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.