These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37681555)

  • 1. Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Aortic Root Replacement With Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Valves: Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.
    Sá MP; Tasoudis P; Jacquemyn X; Van den Eynde J; Caranasos TG; Ikonomidis JS; Chu D; Serna-Gallegos D; Sultan I
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 Sep; 12(18):e030629. PubMed ID: 37681555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root versus composite aortic valve graft replacement for aortic root aneurysm: Meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.
    Sá MP; Jacquemyn X; Van den Eynde J; Chu D; Serna-Gallegos D; Coselli JS; Sultan I
    Am J Surg; 2023 Sep; 226(3):371-378. PubMed ID: 37423780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term outcomes of valve-sparing root versus composite valve graft replacement for acute type A aortic dissection: Meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.
    Sá MP; Tasoudis P; Jacquemyn X; Van den Eynde J; Rad AA; Weymann A; Ruhparwar A; Caranasos TG; Ikonomidis JS; Chu D; Serna-Gallegos D; Sultan I
    Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jul; 382():12-19. PubMed ID: 37004942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-Term Outcomes of Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged Under 50 Years: Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.
    Warraich N; Sá MP; Jacquemyn X; Ahmad D; Serna-Gallegos D; Sultan I
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Sep; 227():11-17. PubMed ID: 39004197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
    McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
    Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
    JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early mortality after aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthetic vs bioprosthetic valves among Medicare beneficiaries: a population-based cohort study.
    Du DT; McKean S; Kelman JA; Laschinger J; Johnson C; Warnock R; Worrall CM; Sedrakyan A; Encinosa W; MaCurdy TE; Izurieta HS
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Nov; 174(11):1788-95. PubMed ID: 25221895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve for aortic valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed individual participant data.
    Tasoudis PT; Varvoglis DN; Vitkos E; Mylonas KS; Sá MP; Ikonomidis JS; Caranasos TG; Athanasiou T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jun; 62(1):. PubMed ID: 35445694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves.
    Dvir D; Webb JG; Bleiziffer S; Pasic M; Waksman R; Kodali S; Barbanti M; Latib A; Schaefer U; Rodés-Cabau J; Treede H; Piazza N; Hildick-Smith D; Himbert D; Walther T; Hengstenberg C; Nissen H; Bekeredjian R; Presbitero P; Ferrari E; Segev A; de Weger A; Windecker S; Moat NE; Napodano M; Wilbring M; Cerillo AG; Brecker S; Tchetche D; Lefèvre T; De Marco F; Fiorina C; Petronio AS; Teles RC; Testa L; Laborde JC; Leon MB; Kornowski R;
    JAMA; 2014 Jul; 312(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 25005653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcomes of aortic root operations in the United States among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Yerokun BA; Vallabhajosyula P; Vekstein AM; Grau-Sepulveda MV; Benrashid E; Xian Y; Ranney DN; Jung SH; Jacobs JP; Badhwar V; Thourani VH; Bavaria JE; Hughes GC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Feb; 165(2):554-565.e6. PubMed ID: 33814173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical Versus Biologic Prostheses for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 70.
    Kytö V; Sipilä J; Ahtela E; Rautava P; Gunn J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Jul; 110(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 31786289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
    Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Undergoing Bentall Procedure.
    Chen CY; Chen CY; Chang FC; Cheng YT; Wu VC; Lin CP; Chan YH; Hung KC; Chu PH; Chen SW
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Jan; 13(1):e030328. PubMed ID: 38156561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Valve type and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in older patients.
    Schelbert EB; Vaughan-Sarrazin MS; Welke KF; Rosenthal GE
    Heart; 2008 Sep; 94(9):1181-8. PubMed ID: 18070945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic root replacement.
    Serna-Gallegos D; Brown JA; Ridgley J; Aranda-Michel E; Navid F; Wang Y; Thoma FW; Sultan I
    J Card Surg; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1861-1867. PubMed ID: 35488772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of Long-Term Structural Deterioration of Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthetic Valves Using the New European Definition.
    Durand E; Sokoloff A; Urena-Alcazar M; Chevalier B; Chassaing S; Didier R; Tron C; Litzler PY; Bouleti C; Himbert D; Hovasse T; Bar O; Avinée G; Iung B; Blanchard D; Gilard M; Cribier A; Lefevre T; Eltchaninoff H
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(4):e007597. PubMed ID: 30998397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years.
    Alex S; Hiebert B; Arora R; Menkis A; Shah P
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):313-321. PubMed ID: 28511244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.