These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37683660)

  • 1. Recommendations for the Screening of Breast Cancer of the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Brazilian Society of Mastology and Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Association.
    Urban LABD; Chala LF; Paula IB; Bauab SDP; Schaefer MB; Oliveira ALK; Shimizu C; Oliveira TMG; Moraes PC; Miranda BMM; Aduan FE; Rego SJF; Canella EO; Couto HL; Badan GM; Francisco JLE; Moraes TP; Jakubiak RR; Peixoto JE
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 45(8):e480-e488. PubMed ID: 37683660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations for breast cancer screening in Brazil, from the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, the Brazilian Society of Mastology, and the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations.
    Urban LABD; Chala LF; de Paula IB; Bauab SDP; Schaefer MB; Oliveira ALK; Shimizu C; de Oliveira TMG; Moraes PC; Miranda BMM; Aduan FE; Rego SJF; Canella EO; Couto HL; Badan GM; Francisco JLE; Moraes TP; Jakubiak RR; Peixoto JE
    Radiol Bras; 2023; 56(4):207-214. PubMed ID: 37829583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer screening: updated recommendations of the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Brazilian Breast Disease Society, and Brazilian Federation of Gynecological and Obstetrical Associations.
    Urban LABD; Chala LF; Bauab SDP; Schaefer MB; Dos Santos RP; Maranhão NMA; Kefalas AL; Kalaf JM; Ferreira CAP; Canella EO; Peixoto JE; de Amorim HLE; de Camargo Junior HSA
    Radiol Bras; 2017; 50(4):244-249. PubMed ID: 28894332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
    Myers ER; Moorman P; Gierisch JM; Havrilesky LJ; Grimm LJ; Ghate S; Davidson B; Mongtomery RC; Crowley MJ; McCrory DC; Kendrick A; Sanders GD
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(15):1615-34. PubMed ID: 26501537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast Cancer Screening: Updated Recommendations of the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Brazilian Breast Disease Society, and Brazilian Federation of Gynecological and Obstetrical Associations.
    Urban LABD; Chala LF; Bauab SDP; Schaefer MB; Santos RPD; Maranhão NMA; Kefalas AL; Kalaf JM; Ferreira CAP; Canella EO; Peixoto JE; Amorim HLE; Camargo Junior HSA
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2017 Oct; 39(10):569-575. PubMed ID: 29036752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ACR Appropriateness Criteria
    ; Mainiero MB; Moy L; Baron P; Didwania AD; diFlorio RM; Green ED; Heller SL; Holbrook AI; Lee SJ; Lewin AA; Lourenco AP; Nance KJ; Niell BL; Slanetz PJ; Stuckey AR; Vincoff NS; Weinstein SP; Yepes MM; Newell MS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Nov; 14(11S):S383-S390. PubMed ID: 29101979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey.
    Sardanelli F; Aase HS; Álvarez M; Azavedo E; Baarslag HJ; Balleyguier C; Baltzer PA; Beslagic V; Bick U; Bogdanovic-Stojanovic D; Briediene R; Brkljacic B; Camps Herrero J; Colin C; Cornford E; Danes J; de Geer G; Esen G; Evans A; Fuchsjaeger MH; Gilbert FJ; Graf O; Hargaden G; Helbich TH; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Ivanov V; Jónsson Á; Kuhl CK; Lisencu EC; Luczynska E; Mann RM; Marques JC; Martincich L; Mortier M; Müller-Schimpfle M; Ormandi K; Panizza P; Pediconi F; Pijnappel RM; Pinker K; Rissanen T; Rotaru N; Saguatti G; Sella T; Slobodníková J; Talk M; Taourel P; Trimboli RM; Vejborg I; Vourtsis A; Forrai G
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2737-2743. PubMed ID: 27807699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.
    Saslow D; Boetes C; Burke W; Harms S; Leach MO; Lehman CD; Morris E; Pisano E; Schnall M; Sener S; Smith RA; Warner E; Yaffe M; Andrews KS; Russell CA;
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2007; 57(2):75-89. PubMed ID: 17392385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil. II - New national recommendations, main evidence, and controversies.
    Migowski A; Silva GAE; Dias MBK; Diz MDPE; Sant'Ana DR; Nadanovsky P
    Cad Saude Publica; 2018 Jun; 34(6):e00074817. PubMed ID: 29947654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of adjunctive tomosynthesis on screening mammography outcomes in two widely diverse radiology practices.
    Poplack SP; Patel AK; Salter A; Langley Blanton H; Murray D; McGuire C
    Breast J; 2021 Jan; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 33274490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
    Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lung cancer screening in Brazil: recommendations from the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, Brazilian Thoracic Association, and Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging.
    Pereira LFF; Santos RSD; Bonomi DO; Franceschini J; Santoro IL; Miotto A; Sousa TLF; Chate RC; Hochhegger B; Gomes Neto A; Schneider A; Araújo Neto CA; Escuissato DL; Prado GF; Costa-Silva L; Zamboni MM; Ghefter MC; Corrêa PCRP; Torres PPTES; Mussi RK; Muglia VF; Godoy I; Bernardo WM
    J Bras Pneumol; 2024; 50(1):e20230233. PubMed ID: 38536982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global guidelines for breast cancer screening: A systematic review.
    Ren W; Chen M; Qiao Y; Zhao F
    Breast; 2022 Aug; 64():85-99. PubMed ID: 35636342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint report of SBI (Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases), FEBRASGO (Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations), SBU (Brazilian Society of Urology) and SBPC/ML (Brazilian Society of Clinical Pathology/Laboratory Medicine): recommendations for the clinical management of lower urinary tract infections in pregnant and non-pregnant women.
    de Rossi P; Cimerman S; Truzzi JC; Cunha CAD; Mattar R; Martino MDV; Hachul M; Andriolo A; Vasconcelos Neto JA; Pereira-Correia JA; Machado AMO; Gales AC
    Braz J Infect Dis; 2020; 24(2):110-119. PubMed ID: 32360431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening.
    Mainiero MB; Lourenco A; Mahoney MC; Newell MS; Bailey L; Barke LD; D'Orsi C; Harvey JA; Hayes MK; Huynh PT; Jokich PM; Lee SJ; Lehman CD; Mankoff DA; Nepute JA; Patel SB; Reynolds HE; Sutherland ML; Haffty BG
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R45-R49. PubMed ID: 27814813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection Rates for Benign and Malignant Diagnoses on Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Statewide Mammography Registry Study.
    Fujii MH; Herschorn SD; Sowden M; Hotaling EL; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Sprague BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Mar; 212(3):706-711. PubMed ID: 30673339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
    Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.