190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37683963)
21. Residual voltage as an ad-hoc indicator of electrode damage in biphasic electrical stimulation.
Krishnan A; Forssell M; Du Z; Cui XT; Fedder GK; Kelly SK
J Neural Eng; 2021 Aug; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 34400592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. 16-Channel biphasic current-mode programmable charge balanced neural stimulation.
Li X; Zhong S; Morizio J
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Aug; 16(1):104. PubMed ID: 28806960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Electrochemical deposition of conductive polymers onto magnesium microwires for neural electrode applications.
Zhang C; Driver N; Tian Q; Jiang W; Liu H
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 Jul; 106(7):1887-1895. PubMed ID: 29520971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fabrication and evaluation of conductive elastomer electrodes for neural stimulation.
Keohan F; Wei XF; Wongsarnpigoon A; Lazaro E; Darga JE; Grill WM
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2007; 18(8):1057-73. PubMed ID: 17705998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Platinum dissolution and tissue response following long-term electrical stimulation at high charge densities.
Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Dalrymple AN; Enke YL; Wise AK; Nguyen T; Firth J; Thompson A; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2021 Mar; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33578409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Dimensional scaling of thin-film stimulation electrode systems in translational research.
Schiavone G; Vachicouras N; Vyza Y; Lacour SP
J Neural Eng; 2021 May; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33831857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Integration of High-Charge-Injection-Capacity Electrodes onto Polymer Softening Neural Interfaces.
Arreaga-Salas DE; Avendaño-Bolívar A; Simon D; Reit R; Garcia-Sandoval A; Rennaker RL; Voit W
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Dec; 7(48):26614-23. PubMed ID: 26575084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long term performance of porous platinum coated neural electrodes.
Leber M; Bhandari R; Mize J; Warren DJ; Shandhi MMH; Solzbacher F; Negi S
Biomed Microdevices; 2017 Sep; 19(3):62. PubMed ID: 28688070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Advanced electrochemical potential monitoring for improved understanding of electrical neurostimulation protocols.
Doering M; Kieninger J; Kübler J; Hofmann UG; Rupitsch SJ; Urban GA; Weltin A
J Neural Eng; 2023 Jun; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 37307808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) for chronic neural stimulation.
Cui XT; Zhou DD
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Dec; 15(4):502-8. PubMed ID: 18198707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Deciphering platinum dissolution in neural stimulation electrodes: Electrochemistry or biology?
Shah DD; Carter P; Shivdasani MN; Fong N; Duan W; Esrafilzadeh D; Poole-Warren LA; Aregueta Robles UA
Biomaterials; 2024 Sep; 309():122575. PubMed ID: 38677220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advances in conductive hydrogels for neural recording and stimulation.
Dawit H; Zhao Y; Wang J; Pei R
Biomater Sci; 2024 May; 12(11):2786-2800. PubMed ID: 38682423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation at high charge densities results in platinum dissolution but not neural loss or functional changes in vivo.
Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Enke YL; Wise AK; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026009. PubMed ID: 30523828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/carbon nanotube neural electrode coatings for stimulation in the dorsal root ganglion.
Kolarcik CL; Catt K; Rost E; Albrecht IN; Bourbeau D; Du Z; Kozai TD; Luo X; Weber DJ; Cui XT
J Neural Eng; 2015 Feb; 12(1):016008. PubMed ID: 25485675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. PEDOT-CNT coated electrodes stimulate retinal neurons at low voltage amplitudes and low charge densities.
Samba R; Herrmann T; Zeck G
J Neural Eng; 2015 Feb; 12(1):016014. PubMed ID: 25588201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biocompatibility considerations at stimulating electrode interfaces.
Beard RB; Hung BN; Schmukler R
Ann Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(3):395-410. PubMed ID: 1443832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Planning system for the optimization of electric field delivery using implanted electrodes for brain tumor control.
Iredale E; Voigt B; Rankin A; Kim KW; Chen JZ; Schmid S; Hebb MO; Peters TM; Wong E
Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):6055-6067. PubMed ID: 35754362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Neural stimulation and recording electrodes.
Cogan SF
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2008; 10():275-309. PubMed ID: 18429704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro biocompatibility and electrical stability of thick-film platinum/gold alloy electrodes printed on alumina.
Carnicer-Lombarte A; Lancashire HT; Vanhoestenberghe A
J Neural Eng; 2017 Jun; 14(3):036012. PubMed ID: 28272027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
