These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37684502)

  • 21. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments.
    Zwetsloot PP; Van Der Naald M; Sena ES; Howells DW; IntHout J; De Groot JA; Chamuleau SA; MacLeod MR; Wever KE
    Elife; 2017 Sep; 6():. PubMed ID: 28884685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta-analyses of health research: A review.
    Page MJ; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT; Egger M
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 33166064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias.
    Hunter JP; Saratzis A; Sutton AJ; Boucher RH; Sayers RD; Bown MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):897-903. PubMed ID: 24794697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
    Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using selection models to assess sensitivity to publication bias: A tutorial and call for more routine use.
    Maier M; VanderWeele TJ; Mathur MB
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 18(3):e1256. PubMed ID: 36909879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Stanley TD; Abrams KR; Peters JL; Cooper NJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():2. PubMed ID: 19138428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):785-794. PubMed ID: 29141096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A review of publication bias in the gastroenterology literature.
    Heavener T; Vassar M
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 37(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 29488081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis.
    Hartmann-Boyce J; Livingstone-Banks J; Ordóñez-Mena JM; Fanshawe TR; Lindson N; Freeman SC; Sutton AJ; Theodoulou A; Aveyard P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 1():CD013229. PubMed ID: 33411338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H; Murad MH; Hong C; Qu Z; Cole SR; Chen Y
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 29663281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Publication bias in otorhinolaryngology meta-analyses in 2021.
    Mohammadian F; Bastaninejad S; Irani S
    Syst Rev; 2024 Jan; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 38169404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Practical considerations on detection of publication bias].
    Palma Pérez S; Delgado Rodríguez M
    Gac Sanit; 2006 Dec; 20 Suppl 3():10-6. PubMed ID: 17433196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study.
    Ayorinde AA; Williams I; Mannion R; Song F; Skrybant M; Lilford RJ; Chen YF
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227580. PubMed ID: 31999702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. P value-driven methods were underpowered to detect publication bias: analysis of Cochrane review meta-analyses.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Xu C; Lin L; Doan T; Chu H; Thalib L; Doi SAR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():86-92. PubMed ID: 31743750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methods for addressing publication bias in school psychology journals: A descriptive review of meta-analyses from 1980 to 2019.
    McClain MB; Callan GL; Harris B; Floyd RG; Haverkamp CR; Golson ME; Longhurst DN; Benallie KJ
    J Sch Psychol; 2021 Feb; 84():74-94. PubMed ID: 33581772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Publication bias & small-study effects in pediatric dentistry meta-analyses.
    Papageorgiou SN; Dimitraki D; Coolidge T; Kotsanos N
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 15(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 25666576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey.
    Ahmed I; Sutton AJ; Riley RD
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7762. PubMed ID: 22214758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods.
    Mueller KF; Meerpohl JJ; Briel M; Antes G; von Elm E; Lang B; Gloy V; Motschall E; Schwarzer G; Bassler D
    Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; 2():60. PubMed ID: 23885765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.