BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37685298)

  • 1. Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound as an Innovative Imaging Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid Filler in Nasolabial Folds.
    Salvia G; Zerbinati N; Manzo Margiotta F; Michelucci A; Granieri G; Fidanzi C; Morganti R; Romanelli M; Dini V
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 37685298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and safety of two hyaluronic acid fillers with different injection depths for the correction of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds: A 52-week, prospective, randomized, double-blinded study in a Chinese population.
    Hu Y; Liu Z; Wang Y; Yu Q; Gong Y; Diao H; Jin Y; Zhang S; Shi Y
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Mar; 21(3):940-948. PubMed ID: 35020250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of a New Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Filler and Biphasic Filler in Correcting Nasolabial Fold.
    Chung C; Lee JH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2902-2908. PubMed ID: 33851255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monophasic versus biphasic hyaluronic acid filler for correcting nasolabial folds: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ghaddaf AA; Aljefri YE; Alharbi FA; Sharif RK; Alnahdi WA; Baaqeel R
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Feb; 21(2):627-635. PubMed ID: 34817919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Two-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of and Satisfaction with Different Methods of ART FILLER® UNIVERSAL Injection for Correcting Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Individuals.
    Feng G; Peng T; Hong WJ; Zhang YL; Li G; Zheng W; Wang H; Luo SK
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1550-1559. PubMed ID: 36810835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced pain with injection of hyaluronic acid with pre-incorporated lidocaine for nasolabial fold correction: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, split-face designed, clinical study.
    Choi SY; Han HS; Yoo KH; Lee JS; Kim BJ; Lee YW
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Dec; 19(12):3229-3233. PubMed ID: 32416026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multi-center comparative efficacy and safety study of two different hyaluronic acid fillers for treatment of nasolabial folds in a Chinese population.
    Li D; Sun J; Wu S
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2019 Jun; 18(3):755-761. PubMed ID: 31074161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Nasolabial Folds.
    Joo HJ; Woo YJ; Kim JE; Kim BJ; Kang H
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):799-808. PubMed ID: 26910660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The efficacy and safety of a monophasic hyaluronic acid filler in the correction of nasolabial folds: A randomized, multicenter, single blinded, split-face study.
    Kwon HJ; Ko EJ; Choi SY; Choi EJ; Jang YJ; Kim BJ; Lee YW
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 17(4):584-589. PubMed ID: 28913927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-Term Follow-Up of Longevity and Diffusion Pattern of Hyaluronic Acid in Nasolabial Fold Correction through High-Frequency Ultrasound.
    Qiao J; Jia QN; Jin HZ; Li F; He CX; Yang J; Zuo YG; Fu LQ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Aug; 144(2):189e-196e. PubMed ID: 31348336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Study.
    Choi WJ; Han SW; Kim JE; Kim HW; Kim MB; Kang H
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):953-62. PubMed ID: 26493557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized, prospective, blinded, split-face, single-center study comparing polycaprolactone to hyaluronic acid for treatment of nasolabial folds.
    Galadari H; van Abel D; Al Nuami K; Al Faresi F; Galadari I
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2015 Mar; 14(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25564797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized comparison of the efficacy of low volume deep placement cheek injection vs. mid- to deep dermal nasolabial fold injection technique for the correction of nasolabial folds.
    Goodier M; Elm K; Wallander I; Zelickson B; Schram S
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2014 Jun; 13(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 24910271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nasolabial fold correction through cheek volume loss restoration versus thread lifting: a comparative study.
    El-Mesidy MS; Alaklouk WT; Azzam OA
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2020 Sep; 312(7):473-480. PubMed ID: 31898756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid filler with lidocaine 0.3% in the correction of nasolabial fold.
    Suh JH; Oh CT; Im SI; Lim JS; Kim BJ; Lee JH
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(3):327-332. PubMed ID: 28145073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and safety of a new resilient hyaluronic acid dermal filler, in the correction of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds: A 64-week, prospective, multicenter, controlled, randomized, double-blind and within-subject study.
    Kaufman-Janette J; Taylor SC; Cox SE; Weinkle SH; Smith S; Kinney BM
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2019 Oct; 18(5):1244-1253. PubMed ID: 31444861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 2.5% agarose gel vs hyaluronic acid filler, for the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds.
    Scuderi N; Fanelli B; Fino P; Kinney BM
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 May; 20(5):1512-1519. PubMed ID: 33533155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective multicenter clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid-based filler with Tri-Hyal technology in the treatment of lips and the perioral area.
    Ehlinger-David A; Gorj M; Braccini F; Loreto F; Grand-Vincent A; Garcia P; Taieb M; Benadiba L; Catoni I; Mathey ER; Deutsch JJ; Bahadoran P; Vincent T; David M; Cartier H; Nadra K; Moellhoff N; Fanian F
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 22(2):464-472. PubMed ID: 35718985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical comparison of two hyaluronic acid-derived fillers in the treatment of nasolabial folds: Mesoglow® and IAL System®.
    Ahn JY; Lee SH; Park KY; Hong CK; Song HJ; Park MY; Choi YS; Seo SJ
    Int J Dermatol; 2012 May; 51(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 22515587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimal recovery time needed to return to social engagement following nasolabial fold correction with hyaluronic acid fillers produced with XpresHAn technology.
    Swift A; von Grote E; Jonas B; Nogueira A
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 2017; 10():229-238. PubMed ID: 28652795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.