These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37685315)

  • 1. Comparison of Fine-Needle Biopsy (FNB) versus Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) Combined with Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Deep-Seated Lymphoma.
    Yang Y; Aruna ; Cheng B; Xiong D; Kuang D; Cui H; Xiong S; Mao X; Feng Y; Zhao Y
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 37685315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fine needle biopsy
    Zhao Y; Xiong D; Aruna ; Chen Q; Kuang D; Xiong S; Wang Y; Yang Y; Guo Q; Chen L; Zhang J; Wu X; Feng Y; Cheng B
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2023; 12(6):456-464. PubMed ID: 38948128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Clin Endosc; 2020 Sep; 53(5):600-610. PubMed ID: 31794654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle biopsy with histology specimen processing.
    Ku L; Shahshahan MA; Hou LA; Eysselein VE; Reicher S
    World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Aug; 12(8):212-219. PubMed ID: 32879656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next-generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and FNB.
    Gan Q; Roy-Chowdhuri S; Duose DY; Stewart JM; Coronel E; Bhutani MS; Lee JH; Weston B; Ge PS; Ross WA; Maitra A
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Apr; 130(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 34905283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of the lung masses: a multicenter experience with fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy needles.
    Mangiavillano B; Spatola F; Facciorusso A; De Nucci G; Ligresti D; Henry Eusebi L; Lisotti A; Auriemma F; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Crinò S; Scarlata S; Troncone E; Del Vecchio Blanco G; Manes G; Traina M; Bertani A; Ofosu A; Binda C; Fabbri C; Muscatiello N; Fusaroli P; Repici A; Carrara S
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Jul; 34(7):757-762. PubMed ID: 35482928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy.
    Aadam AA; Wani S; Amick A; Shah JN; Bhat YM; Hamerski CM; Klapman JB; Muthusamy VR; Watson RR; Rademaker AW; Keswani RN; Keefer L; Das A; Komanduri S
    Endosc Int Open; 2016 May; 4(5):E497-505. PubMed ID: 27227104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
    El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An exclusive fine-needle biopsy approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance: a prospective cohort study.
    Temnykh LM; Rahal MA; Zia Z; Al-Haddad MA
    Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2020 Oct; 8(5):349-354. PubMed ID: 33163189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration
    Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Madruga-Neto AC; Ryou M; Thompson CC
    World J Clin Cases; 2021 Dec; 9(34):10507-10517. PubMed ID: 35004982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Keswani RN; Krishnan K; Wani S; Keefer L; Komanduri S
    Clin Endosc; 2014 May; 47(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 24944988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.