These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37685323)

  • 1. Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification.
    Pelayo M; Sancho-Sauco J; Sánchez-Zurdo J; Perez-Mies B; Abarca-Martínez L; Cancelo-Hidalgo MJ; Sainz-Bueno JA; Alcázar JL; Pelayo-Delgado I
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 37685323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound Features and Ultrasound Scores in the Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.
    Pelayo M; Sancho-Sauco J; Sanchez-Zurdo J; Abarca-Martinez L; Borrero-Gonzalez C; Sainz-Bueno JA; Alcazar JL; Pelayo-Delgado I
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(13):. PubMed ID: 37443546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Ultrasound Scores in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.
    Pelayo M; Pelayo-Delgado I; Sancho-Sauco J; Sanchez-Zurdo J; Abarca-Martinez L; Corraliza-Galán V; Martin-Gromaz C; Pablos-Antona MJ; Zurita-Calvo J; Alcázar JL
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37046525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
    Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions.
    Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smolen A; Łoziński T; Guzik P; Kluz T
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
    Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
    Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. O-RADS Classification for Ultrasound Assessment of Adnexal Masses: Agreement between IOTA Lexicon and ADNEX Model for Assigning Risk Group.
    Vara J; Pagliuca M; Springer S; Gonzalez de Canales J; Brotons I; Yakcich J; Ajossa S; Pascual MA; Guerriero S; Alcazar JL
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36832161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sonographic Assessment of Complex Ultrasound Morphology Adnexal Tumors in Pregnant Women with the Use of IOTA Simple Rules Risk and ADNEX Scoring Systems.
    Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smoleń A; Kluz T; Łoziński T; Miturski A; Kraczkowski J
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33671023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of ADNEX and IOTA two-step strategy and estimation of risk of complications during follow-up of adnexal masses in low-risk population.
    Pascual MA; Vancraeynest L; Timmerman S; Ceusters J; Ledger A; Graupera B; Rodriguez I; Valero B; Landolfo C; Testa AC; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Van Calster B; Froyman W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating use of IOTA two-step strategy to classify adnexal masses identified in pregnancy: pilot study.
    Barcroft J; Pandrich M; Del Forno S; Cooper N; Linton-Reid K; Landolfo C; Timmerman D; Saso S; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38787921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System with final histological diagnosis in adnexal masses: a retrospective study.
    Filiz AA; Kahyaoglu S; Atalay CR
    Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2024 Jan; 67(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 37822234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer.
    Pozzati F; Sassu CM; Marini G; Mascilini F; Biscione A; Giannarelli D; Garganese G; Fragomeni SM; Scambia G; Testa AC; Moro F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 37204769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
    Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: validation of O-RADS and comparison with ADNEX model, SA, and RMI.
    Wang R; Yang Z
    Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 36929789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
    J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of Diagnostic Efficacy of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX Model and the ACR O-RADS US (Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System) for Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors: A Retrospective Study in a Tumor Center in Northeast China.
    Zhong D; Gao XQ; Li HX; Wang HB; Liu Y
    J Imaging Inform Med; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38977614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions.
    Chen GY; Hsu TF; Chan IS; Liu CH; Chao WT; Shih YC; Jiang LY; Chang YH; Wang PH; Chen YJ
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7854-7864. PubMed ID: 35583711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple rules, O-RADS, ADNEX and SRR model: Single oncologic center validation of diagnostic predictive models alone and combined (two-step strategy) to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses and ovarian tumors.
    Spagnol G; Marchetti M; De Tommasi O; Vitagliano A; Cavallin F; Tozzi R; Saccardi C; Noventa M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Oct; 177():109-116. PubMed ID: 37660412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.