These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

45 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37687525)

  • 21. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements after aqueous aging.
    Pan Y; Xu X; Sun F; Meng X
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Nov; 27():e20170449. PubMed ID: 30427472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type.
    Sofan E; Sofan A; Palaia G; Tenore G; Romeo U; Migliau G
    Ann Stomatol (Roma); 2017; 8(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 28736601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review.
    Chesterman J; Jowett A; Gallacher A; Nixon P
    Br Dent J; 2017 Mar; 222(5):337-344. PubMed ID: 28281590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Elastic Properties of Lithium Disilicate Versus Feldspathic Inlays: Effect on the Bonding by 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Trindade FZ; Valandro LF; de Jager N; Bottino MA; Kleverlaan CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Oct; 27(8):741-747. PubMed ID: 27696615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fracture toughness of seven resin composites evaluated by three methods of mode I fracture toughness (K
    Mese A; Ea Palamara J; Bagheri R; Fani M; Burrow MF
    Dent Mater J; 2016 Dec; 35(6):893-899. PubMed ID: 27680036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new concept and finite-element study on dental bond strength tests.
    Jin XZ; Homaei E; Matinlinna JP; Tsoi JKH
    Dent Mater; 2016 Oct; 32(10):e238-e250. PubMed ID: 27497744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative study of the dentin bond strength of a new universal adhesive.
    Jang JH; Lee MG; Woo SU; Lee CO; Yi JK; Kim DS
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(4):606-12. PubMed ID: 27477226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance.
    Yoshihara K; Nagaoka N; Okihara T; Kuroboshi M; Hayakawa S; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; De Munck J; Yoshida Y; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1493-501. PubMed ID: 26518339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maximum bite force analysis in different age groups.
    Takaki P; Vieira M; Bommarito S
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 18(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 25992105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dental materials--what goes where? The current status of glass ionomer as a material for loadbearing restorations in posterior teeth.
    Burke FJ
    Dent Update; 2013 Dec; 40(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 24597029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant- abutment interface designs.
    Tang CB; Liul SY; Zhou GX; Yu JH; Zhang GD; Bao YD; Wang QJ
    Int J Oral Sci; 2012 Jun; 4(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 22699263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials.
    Demarco FF; Corrêa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jan; 28(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 22192253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture toughness of two dentin adhesives.
    Howard K; Söderholm KJ
    Dent Mater; 2010 Dec; 26(12):1185-92. PubMed ID: 20932565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review.
    Koc D; Dogan A; Bek B
    Eur J Dent; 2010 Apr; 4(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 20396457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adhesive bond strengths to enamel and dentin using recommended and extended treatment times.
    Kimmes NS; Barkmeier WW; Erickson RL; Latta MA
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 20166418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Physical properties of a new silorane-based restorative system.
    Lien W; Vandewalle KS
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 20053434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials.
    Drummond JL
    J Dent Res; 2008 Aug; 87(8):710-9. PubMed ID: 18650540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites.
    Watanabe H; Khera SC; Vargas MA; Qian F
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):418-25. PubMed ID: 17697707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Micromechanical analysis of dentin/adhesive interface by the finite element method.
    Misra A; Spencer P; Marangos O; Wang Y; Katz JL
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2004 Jul; 70(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 15199584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fracture toughness of dental ceramics: comparison of bending and indentation method.
    Fischer H; Marx R
    Dent Mater; 2002 Jan; 18(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 11740960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.