These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37687865)

  • 1. Perforated Concave Earplug (pCEP): A Proof-of-Concept Earplug to Improve Sound Localization without Compromising Noise Attenuation.
    Fink N; Levitas R; Eisenkraft A; Wagnert-Avraham L; Gertz SD; Fostick L
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 37687865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Situational Awareness: The Effect of Stimulus Type and Hearing Protection on Sound Localization.
    Fostick L; Fink N
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The challenge of localizing vehicle backup alarms: effects of passive and electronic hearing protectors, ambient noise level, and backup alarm spectral content.
    Alali KA; Casali JG
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):99-112. PubMed ID: 21368435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Azimuthal auditory localization of gunshots in a realistic field environment: effects of open-ear versus hearing protection-enhancement devices (HPEDs), military vehicle noise, and hearing impairment.
    Talcott KA; Casali JG; Keady JP; Killion MC
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51 Suppl 1():S20-30. PubMed ID: 22264060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of an auditory situation awareness test battery for advanced hearing protectors and TCAPS: detection subtest of DRILCOM (detection-recognition/identification-localization-communication).
    Lee K; Casali JG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):22-33. PubMed ID: 27905220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Hearing and Head Protection on the Localization of Tonal and Broadband Reverse Alarms.
    Laroche C; Giguère C; Vaillancourt V; Marleau C; Cadieux MF; Laprise-Girard K; Gula E; Carroll V; Bibeau M; Nélisse H
    Hum Factors; 2022 Nov; 64(7):1105-1120. PubMed ID: 33596712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A field investigation of hearing protection and hearing enhancement in one device: for soldiers whose ears and lives depend upon it.
    Casali JG; Ahroon WA; Lancaster JA
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(42):69-90. PubMed ID: 19265256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The study of attenuation levels and the comfort of earplugs.
    Samelli AG; Gomes RF; Chammas TV; Silva BG; Moreira RR; Fiorini AC
    Noise Health; 2018; 20(94):112-119. PubMed ID: 29785976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
    Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The efficacy of earplugs at a major hazard facility.
    Lee KH; Benke G; Mckenzie D
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Mar; 45(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 35023076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How hearing conservation training format impacts personal attenuation ratings in U.S. Marine Corps Training Recruits.
    Federman J; Karch SJ; Duhon C
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 32924674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Better protection from blasts without sacrificing situational awareness.
    Killion MC; Monroe T; Drambarean V
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50 Suppl 1():S38-45. PubMed ID: 21288067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of hearing protection on sound localization and orienting behavior.
    Simpson BD; Bolia RS; McKinley RL; Brungart DS
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 15960096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training to Improve Spatial Hearing and Situation Awareness when Wearing Hearing Protection.
    Golob EJ; Nelson JT; Walasek JA; Piedra ET; Mock JR; Adams MJK; Esquivel CCR; Spear CSA
    Mil Med; 2024 Jan; 189(1-2):e306-e312. PubMed ID: 37715688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.