These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37688483)

  • 21. Inference of hazel grouse population structure using multilocus data: a landscape genetic approach.
    Sahlsten J; Thörngren H; Höglund J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Dec; 101(6):475-82. PubMed ID: 18827838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatially explicit models of seasonal habitat for greater sage-grouse at broad spatial scales: Informing areas for management in Nevada and northeastern California.
    Coates PS; Brussee BE; Ricca MA; Severson JP; Casazza ML; Gustafson KB; Espinosa SP; Gardner SC; Delehanty DJ
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Jan; 10(1):104-118. PubMed ID: 31993115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neoplasia in free-flying ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus).
    Howerth EW; Schorr LF; Nettles VF
    Avian Dis; 1986; 30(1):238-40. PubMed ID: 3729869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative study of cadmium and copper in ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) in regions with and without historic mining.
    Snively M; Flaspohler DJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2006 Oct; 65(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 16750853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coniferyl benzoate in quaking aspen A ruffed grouse feeding deterrent.
    Jakubas WJ; Gullion GW
    J Chem Ecol; 1990 Apr; 16(4):1077-87. PubMed ID: 24263713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New strategies for characterizing genetic structure in wide-ranging, continuously distributed species: A Greater Sage-grouse case study.
    Oyler-McCance SJ; Cross TB; Row JR; Schwartz MK; Naugle DE; Fike JA; Winiarski K; Fedy BC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274189. PubMed ID: 36099302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monitoring landscape changes in Caucasian black grouse (Tetrao mlokosiewiczi) habitat in Iran during the last two decades.
    Darvishi A; Fakheran S; Soffianian A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Jul; 187(7):443. PubMed ID: 26088757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ruffed grouse feeding behavior and its relationship to secondary metabolites of quaking aspen flower buds.
    Jakubas WJ; Gullion GW; Clausen TP
    J Chem Ecol; 1989 Jun; 15(6):1899-917. PubMed ID: 24272191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Habitat fragmentation influences genetic diversity and differentiation: Fine-scale population structure of
    Ony MA; Nowicki M; Boggess SL; Klingeman WE; Zobel JM; Trigiano RN; Hadziabdic D
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Apr; 10(8):3655-3670. PubMed ID: 32313625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Landscape characteristics influencing the genetic structure of greater sage-grouse within the stronghold of their range: a holistic modeling approach.
    Row JR; Oyler-McCance SJ; Fike JA; O'Donnell MS; Doherty KE; Aldridge CL; Bowen ZH; Fedy BC
    Ecol Evol; 2015 May; 5(10):1955-69. PubMed ID: 26045948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of matrix on the occurrence of hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in isolated habitat fragments.
    Åberg J; Jansson G; Swenson JE; Angelstam P
    Oecologia; 1995 Aug; 103(3):265-269. PubMed ID: 28306818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of parasite-driven selection in shaping landscape genomic structure in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotica).
    Wenzel MA; Douglas A; James MC; Redpath SM; Piertney SB
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):324-41. PubMed ID: 26578090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of drivers of spatial genetic variation of a ground-dwelling bird species and its implications for conservation.
    Kunz F; Klinga P; Sittenthaler M; Schebeck M; Stauffer C; Grünschachner-Berger V; Hackländer K; Nopp-Mayr U
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Jan; 12(1):e8460. PubMed ID: 35127012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Landscape genomic signatures indicate reduced gene flow and forest-associated adaptive divergence in an endangered neotropical turtle.
    Gallego-García N; Forero-Medina G; Vargas-Ramírez M; Caballero S; Shaffer HB
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Jun; 28(11):2757-2771. PubMed ID: 31013379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms shape the genomic landscape of deer mice.
    Harringmeyer OS; Hoekstra HE
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2022 Dec; 6(12):1965-1979. PubMed ID: 36253543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting greater sage-grouse habitat selection at the southern periphery of their range.
    Picardi S; Messmer T; Crabb B; Kohl M; Dahlgren D; Frey N; Larsen R; Baxter R
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):13451-13463. PubMed ID: 33304551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Seasonal Variation in Forebrain Region Sizes in Male Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus).
    Krilow JM; Iwaniuk AN
    Brain Behav Evol; 2015; 85(3):189-202. PubMed ID: 25997574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Disrupted fine-scale population processes in fragmented landscapes despite large-scale genetic connectivity for a widespread and common cooperative breeder: the superb fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus).
    Harrisson KA; Pavlova A; Amos JN; Takeuchi N; Lill A; Radford JQ; Sunnucks P
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Mar; 82(2):322-33. PubMed ID: 23190389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.