These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37688800)

  • 1. Avoiding bias in estimates of population size for translocation management.
    Bickerton KT; Ewen JG; Canessa S; Cole NC; Frost F; Mootoocurpen R; McCrea R
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Dec; 33(8):e2918. PubMed ID: 37688800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of capture-recapture monitoring of elusive species illustrated with a threatened grasshopper.
    Bröder L; Tatin L; Hochkirch A; Schuld A; Pabst L; Besnard A
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):743-753. PubMed ID: 31825105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of social organization, trap arrangement and density, sampling scale, and population density on bias in population size estimation using some common mark-recapture estimators.
    Gupta M; Joshi A; Vidya TN
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173609. PubMed ID: 28306735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-structured Jolly-Seber model expands inference and improves parameter estimation from capture-recapture data.
    Hostetter NJ; Lunn NJ; Richardson ES; Regehr EV; Converse SJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252748. PubMed ID: 34106979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intercalibration of hydroacoustic and mark-recapture methods for assessing the spawning population size of a threatened fish species.
    Rakowitz G; Kubecka J; Fesl C; Keckeis H
    J Fish Biol; 2009 Oct; 75(6):1356-70. PubMed ID: 20738619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new mark-recapture approach for abundance estimation of social species.
    Hickey JR; Sollmann R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208726. PubMed ID: 30571710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dispersal and population state of an endangered island lizard following a conservation translocation.
    Angeli NF; Lundgren IF; Pollock CG; Hillis-Starr ZM; Fitzgerald LA
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Mar; 28(2):336-347. PubMed ID: 29350826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating acoustic telemetry into mark-recapture models to improve the precision of apparent survival and abundance estimates.
    Dudgeon CL; Pollock KH; Braccini JM; Semmens JM; Barnett A
    Oecologia; 2015 Jul; 178(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 25740335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A likelihood-based approach to capture-recapture estimation of demographic parameters under the robust design.
    Kendall WL; Pollock KH; Brownie C
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):293-308. PubMed ID: 7766783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival of bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, estimated from 1981-1998 photoidentification data.
    Zeh J; Poole D; Miller G; Koski W; Baraff L; Rugh D
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):832-40. PubMed ID: 12495137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: II. Jolly-Seber model.
    Pledger S; Pollock KH; Norris JL
    Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):883-90. PubMed ID: 19930186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber model.
    Pledger S; Pollock KH; Norris JL
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):786-94. PubMed ID: 14969456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
    Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Demography of a reintroduced population: moving toward management models for an endangered species, the Whooping Crane.
    Servanty S; Converse SJ; Bailey LL
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Jul; 24(5):927-37. PubMed ID: 25154087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complete tag loss in capture-recapture studies affects abundance estimates: An elephant seal case study.
    Malcolm-White E; McMahon CR; Cowen LLE
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar; 10(5):2377-2384. PubMed ID: 32184988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture.
    Glennie R; Borchers DL; Murchie M; Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1345-1355. PubMed ID: 31045249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sources of bias in applying close-kin mark-recapture to terrestrial game species with different life histories.
    Sévêque A; Lonsinger RC; Waits LP; Brzeski KE; Komoroske LM; Ott-Conn CN; Mayhew SL; Norton DC; Petroelje TR; Swenson JD; Morin DJ
    Ecology; 2024 Mar; 105(3):e4244. PubMed ID: 38272487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Partial and complete dependency among data sets has minimal consequence on estimates from integrated population models.
    Weegman MD; Arnold TW; Clark RG; Schaub M
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Apr; 31(3):e2258. PubMed ID: 33176007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of mark-recapture and acoustic detections for unbiased population estimation in animal communities.
    Jarrett C; Haydon DT; Morales JM; Ferreira DF; Forzi FA; Welch AJ; Powell LL; Matthiopoulos J
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3769. PubMed ID: 35620844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.