These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37689623)

  • 1. Using public clinical trial reports to probe non-experimental causal inference methods.
    Steinberg E; Ignatiadis N; Yadlowsky S; Xu Y; Shah N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Sep; 23(1):204. PubMed ID: 37689623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement for patients with multimorbidities: a cohort study using propensity score stratification and inverse probability weighting.
    Prats-Uribe A; Kolovos S; Berencsi K; Carr A; Judge A; Silman A; Arden N; Petersen I; Douglas IJ; Wilkinson JM; Murray D; Valderas JM; Beard DJ; Lamb SE; Ali MS; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Strauss VY; Prieto-Alhambra D
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Nov; 25(66):1-126. PubMed ID: 34812138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.
    Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimizing bias in massive multi-arm observational studies with BCAUS: balancing covariates automatically using supervision.
    Belthangady C; Stedden W; Norgeot B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):190. PubMed ID: 34544367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Propensity Scores for Causal Inference: Pitfalls and Tips.
    Shiba K; Kawahara T
    J Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):457-463. PubMed ID: 34121051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Matching algorithms for causal inference with multiple treatments.
    Scotina AD; Gutman R
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(17):3139-3167. PubMed ID: 31066079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating Bayesian methods into the propensity score matching framework: A no-treatment effect safety analysis.
    Li L; Donnell ET
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105691. PubMed ID: 32711214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causal inference with observational data in addiction research.
    Chan GCK; Lim C; Sun T; Stjepanovic D; Connor J; Hall W; Leung J
    Addiction; 2022 Oct; 117(10):2736-2744. PubMed ID: 35661462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining machine learning and propensity score weighting to estimate causal effects in multivalued treatments.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):871-881. PubMed ID: 27421786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Propensity score-integrated Bayesian prior approaches for augmented control designs: a simulation study.
    Wang X; Suttner L; Jemielita T; Li X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Jan; 32(1):170-190. PubMed ID: 34939894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approximate Bayesian Bootstrap procedures to estimate multilevel treatment effects in observational studies with application to type 2 diabetes treatment regimens.
    Scotina AD; Zullo AR; Smith RJ; Gutman R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3362-3380. PubMed ID: 32588747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Bayesian nonparametric approach to causal inference on quantiles.
    Xu D; Daniels MJ; Winterstein AG
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):986-996. PubMed ID: 29478267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of empirical Bayes and propensity score methods for road safety evaluation: A simulation study.
    Li H; Graham DJ; Ding H; Ren G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():148-155. PubMed ID: 31150921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining propensity score-based stratification and weighting to improve causal inference in the evaluation of health care interventions.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):1065-71. PubMed ID: 25266868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing approaches to causal inference for longitudinal data: inverse probability weighting versus propensity scores.
    Ertefaie A; Stephens DA
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 14. PubMed ID: 21969998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two basic statistical strategies of conducting causal inference in real-world studies.
    Fang Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Dec; 99():106193. PubMed ID: 33153972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Squeezing observational data for better causal inference: Methods and examples for prevention research.
    Garcia-Huidobro D; Michael Oakes J
    Int J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 27094382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.