122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37689967)
21. Cold rearing improves cold-flight performance in Drosophila via changes in wing morphology.
Frazier MR; Harrison JF; Kirkton SD; Roberts SP
J Exp Biol; 2008 Jul; 211(Pt 13):2116-22. PubMed ID: 18552301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Co-evolving wing spots and mating displays are genetically separable traits in Drosophila.
Massey JH; Rice GR; Firdaus AS; Chen CY; Yeh SD; Stern DL; Wittkopp PJ
Evolution; 2020 Jun; 74(6):1098-1111. PubMed ID: 32363590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Developmental time, body size and wing loading in Drosophila buzzatii from lowland and highland populations in Argentina.
Norry FM; Bubliy OA; Loeschcke V
Hereditas; 2001; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12035612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Developmental stability in hybrids between the sibling species pair, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
Markow TA; Ricker JP
Genetica; 1991; 84(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 1756963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative life histories and ecophysiology of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
David JR; Allemand R; Capy P; Chakir M; Gibert P; Pétavy G; Moreteau B
Genetica; 2004 Mar; 120(1-3):151-63. PubMed ID: 15088655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Narrow versus broad: sexual dimorphism in the wing form of western European species of the subgenus Avaritia (Culicoides, Ceratopogonidae).
Muñoz-Muñoz F; Pagès N; Durao AF; England M; Werner D; Talavera S
Integr Zool; 2021 Sep; 16(5):769-784. PubMed ID: 33433938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sex-related interannual plasticity in wing morphological design in Heliconius charithonia enhances flight metabolic performance.
Ramos-Pérez VI; Castellanos I; Robinson-Fuentes VA; Macías-Ordóñez R; Mendoza-Cuenca L
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239620. PubMed ID: 33125377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Coevolution between flight morphology, vertical stratification and sexual dimorphism: what can we learn from tropical butterflies?
Graça MB; Pequeno PACL; Franklin E; Morais JW
J Evol Biol; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1862-1871. PubMed ID: 28714129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of microhabitat variability on body size in Drosophila subobscura.
Stamenković-Radak M; Rasić G; Cucković M; Savić T; Andjelković M
Folia Biol (Krakow); 2008; 56(1-2):51-6. PubMed ID: 19055025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hox dosage contributes to flight appendage morphology in Drosophila.
Paul R; Giraud G; Domsch K; Duffraisse M; Marmigère F; Khan S; Vanderperre S; Lohmann I; Stoks R; Shashidhara LS; Merabet S
Nat Commun; 2021 May; 12(1):2892. PubMed ID: 34001903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Variations in morphological and life-history traits under extreme temperatures in Drosophila ananassae.
Sisodia S; Singh BN
J Biosci; 2009 Jun; 34(2):263-74. PubMed ID: 19550042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Male genital and wing morphology in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila gouveai and Drosophila antonietae and their hybrids reared in different host plants.
Soto IM; Soto EM; Corio C; Carreira VP; Manfrin M; Hasson E
Environ Entomol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):865-73. PubMed ID: 20550800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Wing shape and developmental temperature in two Drosophila species: different wing regions exhibit different reaction norms].
Moreto B; Imasheva AG; Moren Zh-; David ZhR
Genetika; 1998 Feb; 34(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 9589855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Wing morphology, flight type and migration distance predict accumulated fuel load in birds.
Vincze O; Vágási CI; Pap PL; Palmer C; Møller AP
J Exp Biol; 2019 Jan; 222(Pt 1):. PubMed ID: 30446537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Micro-morphological adaptations of the wing nodus to flight behaviour in four dragonfly species from the family Libellulidae (Odonata: Anisoptera).
Rajabi H; Stamm K; Appel E; Gorb SN
Arthropod Struct Dev; 2018 Jul; 47(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 29339328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Genetic variability of sexual size dimorphism in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale-line approach.
David JR; Gibert P; Mignon-Grasteau S; Legout H; Pétavy G; Beaumont C; Moreteau B
J Genet; 2003 Dec; 82(3):79-88. PubMed ID: 15133187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sexual isolation between Drosophila melanogaster females and D. simulans males. Male mating propensities versus success in hybridization.
Jamart JA; Carracedo MC; Casares P
Experientia; 1993 Jul; 49(6-7):596-8. PubMed ID: 8335085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans: so similar yet so different.
Capy P; Gibert P
Genetica; 2004 Mar; 120(1-3):5-16. PubMed ID: 15088643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Shape, flapping and flexion: wing and fin design for forward flight.
Combes SA; Daniel TL
J Exp Biol; 2001 Jun; 204(Pt 12):2073-85. PubMed ID: 11441049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multiple paternity and sperm competition in the sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and Drosophila koepferae.
Hurtado J; Iglesias PP; Lipko P; Hasson E
Mol Ecol; 2013 Oct; 22(19):5016-26. PubMed ID: 23952173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
