These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37690124)

  • 1. Sensitivity and specificity of secondary dose calculation for head and neck treatment plans.
    Wegener S; Abu Rashed R; Sauer OA; Razinskas G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 24(12):e14139. PubMed ID: 37690124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity and specificity of Varian Halcyon's portal dosimetry for plan-specific pre-treatment QA.
    Razinskas G; Schindhelm R; Sauer OA; Wegener S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 24(8):e14001. PubMed ID: 37086428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment plan prescreening for patient-specific quality assurance measurements using independent Monte Carlo dose calculations.
    Xu Y; Zhang K; Liu Z; Liang B; Ma X; Ren W; Men K; Dai J
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1051110. PubMed ID: 36419878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
    Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
    Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
    Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of 4-Hz log files and secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation as patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT prostate plans.
    Szeverinski P; Kowatsch M; Künzler T; Meinschad M; Clemens P; DeVries AF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):235-244. PubMed ID: 34151502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.
    Lin MH; Koren S; Veltchev I; Li J; Wang L; Price RA; Ma CM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):3929. PubMed ID: 23470927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a secondary dose check tool against Monte Carlo and analytical clinical dose calculation algorithms in VMAT.
    Piffer S; Casati M; Marrazzo L; Arilli C; Calusi S; Desideri I; Fusi F; Pallotta S; Talamonti C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 22(4):52-62. PubMed ID: 33735491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK to detect errors in 6MV FFF VMAT delivery of brain SABR using ROC analysis.
    Tattenberg S; Hyde D; Milette MP; Parodi K; Araujo C; Carlone M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 22(6):35-44. PubMed ID: 34021691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of machine log files/MC-based treatment planning and delivery QA as compared to ArcCHECK QA.
    Stanhope CW; Drake DG; Liang J; Alber M; Söhn M; Habib C; Willcut V; Yan D
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2864-2874. PubMed ID: 29676463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
    Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
    Lee B; Jeong S; Chung K; Yoon M; Park HC; Han Y; Jung SH
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):101-110. PubMed ID: 31544350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. IMRT QA and gamma comparisons: The impact of detector geometry, spatial sampling, and delivery technique on gamma comparison sensitivity.
    Steers JM; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5367-5381. PubMed ID: 34036596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A structured FMEA approach to optimizing combinations of plan-specific quality assurance techniques for IMRT and VMAT QA.
    O'Daniel JC; Giles W; Cui Y; Adamson J
    Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5387-5397. PubMed ID: 37475493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) quality assurance (QA) systems: sensitivity analysis to machine errors.
    Liang B; Liu B; Zhou F; Yin FF; Wu Q
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Nov; 11(1):146. PubMed ID: 27821135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
    Li G; Bai S; Chen N; Henderson L; Wu K; Xiao J; Zhang Y; Jiang Q; Jiang X
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 14(5):13-24. PubMed ID: 24036856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of DVH-based plan verification methods for VMAT: ArcCHECK-3DVH system and dynalog-based dose reconstruction.
    Saito M; Kadoya N; Sato K; Ito K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Onishi H; Jingu K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 18(4):206-214. PubMed ID: 28649722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
    Coleman L; Skourou C
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial experience of ArcCHECK and 3DVH software for RapidArc treatment plan verification.
    Infusino E; Mameli A; Conti R; Gaudino D; Stimato G; Bellesi L; D'Angelillo RM; Ramella S; Benassi M; Trodella L
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 25088815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent recalculation outperforms traditional measurement-based IMRT QA methods in detecting unacceptable plans.
    Kry SF; Glenn MC; Peterson CB; Branco D; Mehrens H; Steinmann A; Followill DS
    Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3700-3708. PubMed ID: 31152568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.